Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Workforce Development Board Representation |
SB |
257/a SFC |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Collard |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to HB 540
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Economic
Development Department
Human
Services Department
Labor
Department
Response
Not Received From
Commission
on Higher Education
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee amendment to Senate
Bill 257 removes the governor-appointed designees and adds secretary-appointed
designees.
Significant
Issues
It should be noted that federal regulations
require the state workforce development board members to be appointed by the
governor.
Synopsis of Original
Bill
Senate Bill 257 changes the representation on
the state workforce development board.
The bill proposes to allow governor-appointed designees in lieu of the
Secretary of the Economic Development Department, the Secretary of the Human
Services Department, the Secretary of Public Instruction, and the Secretary of
the Labor Department.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no significant fiscal implications
associated with this bill.
DUPLICATION
Senate Bill 257
duplicates House Bill 540.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
primary action taken by the bill is to revise the statute related to the state
workforce board. The bill adds language for each required secretary that allows
the governor to appoint an approved designee instead of the secretary. This
bill appears to address issues surrounding the attendance of other members of
the identified departments instead of the Secretary.
It should
be noted, private sector board members have complained at state board meetings
about the lack of secretarial attendance. The state workforce board has assumed
that these positions represented the identified departments and allowed others
to fully participate at their meetings. This bill does not clearly address this
concern and also fails to identify if the designee would come from the designated
department. Without language clarifying the designated individual is the member
and not the department, the bill could still result in different departmental
representatives participating at state board meetings.
KBC/lg