Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Altamirano |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Guadalupe |
SB |
233 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Bransford |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$828.0 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 234, SB 275 and HB 255
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Public
Defender Department (PDD)
Attorney
General (AG)
Administrative
Office of the Courts (
4th
Judicial District Attorney (DA)
Corrections
Department (CD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 233 appropriates $828 thousand from
the general fund to the fourth judicial district attorney ($578 thousand) and
the attorney general ($250 thousand) for the purpose of prosecuting the capital
felony cases that arose from the riot at the Guadalupe county correctional
facility.
Significant Issues
Contract attorneys representing the three
defendants have a motion pending before recently retired District Judge Frank
Allen requesting dismissal from the case
because they are not being compensated enough to provide adequate
representation. Contract attorneys for
the PDD are paid on flat fee schedule.
However, both the New Mexico State Bar and the American Bar Association
recommend that attorneys representing capital defendants be compensated on an
hourly basis. The cases are expected to
proceed to trial within the year. To
date a total of $4.2 million has been spent on the prosecution and defense of
these cases (See Attachment).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $828 thousand contained in
this bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or
unencumbered balance remaining at the end of a fiscal year shall not revert to
the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The
attorney general’s office points out that capital litigation is the most
complex, and time consuming of criminal cases.
The cases involve a total of 15 defendants and include over 70,000 pages
of discovery. (11 defendants have
entered guilty pleas to lesser charges while 3 are pending death penalty trials.) As a result, as each defendant files his
motion or makes a request for discovery the State must respond. In practice this results in multiple
interviews and overlapping but distinct motions being filed with the trial
court. Death penalty cases involve detailed
and thorough investigation, discovery and interview processes. In addition expert witnesses and motion
practice is more frequent in capital cases.
RELATIONSHIP
This bill relates to SB 275 and HB 255 both of
which would create a new fund, the Capital Felony Representation Fund, in the
public defender department. It also
relates to SB 234 which requests a total appropriation of $895 thousand for the
defense of these cases.
VB/lg