Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Fidel |
DATE TYPED |
1/31/2004 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
|
SB |
231 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Valenzuela |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
NFI |
|
NFI |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Public
Regulation Commission
Department
of Transportation
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate
Bill 231 provides more authority for county commissions to impose and collect
reasonable franchise fees and compensation for the use of the road and highway
infrastructure.
Significant Issues
The New Mexico Department of Transportation
reports that because the term “public
highways” is not defined, the bill is unclear as to whether it authorizes
counties to collect franchise fees and reasonable compensation solely for the
use of public highways under the jurisdiction of the county, or whether it also
allows counties to collect such fees and compensation for the use of highways
under the jurisdiction of the NM Department of Transportation. Under current law, counties do not have the
authority to regulate the use of state highways.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
SB231 does not contain an appropriation.
Enactment would not have a fiscal impact on state agencies. Potentially,
counties in
RELATIONSHIP
According
to the Public Regulation Commission, Section 3-42-1 NMSA grants the authority
to municipalities to grant, by ordinance, a franchise for the construction and
operation of any public utility; there is no specific language regarding costs. However, a 1978 Attorney General’s opinion
stated that a public utility franchise may be viewed as a contract between the
utility and the county and these contracts may provide for the payment of reasonable
expenses incident to the granting and exercise of the franchise.
MFV/lg