Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Nava |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Deaf Children’s Educational Bill of Rights |
SB |
206/aSEC/aSJC |
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB 186
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Response
Received From
New
Mexico Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SJC Amendment
The Senate Judiciary Committee Amendment strikes
Section 3. DEFINITION; and insert the references to “early intervention, early
childhood and kindergarten through twelfth grade” in Section 4.
Synopsis
of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee amendments make
Senate Bill 206 a duplicate of House Bill 186/aHEC/HFL#1:
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 206 enacts
the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Educational Bill of
Significant Issues
The PED reports that students who are deaf or
hard-of-hearing are served pursuant to the provisions of the Individuals with
Disabilities Act (IDEA), and that 800 regulatory requirements associated with
IDEA that describe evaluation, services, and programming and procedural
safeguards for students with disabilities, including students who are deaf or
hard-of-hearing. According to the PED,
this bill would create additional requirements for entities that serve the
educational needs of these students.
FISCAL
IMPACT
The PED analysis states the fiscal impact is
unknown because it is difficult to estimate the costs that might be incurred
from litigation that might accompany from the formal complaint process
associated with the safeguards provided by IDEA.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The PED analysis indicates that an
additional FTE may be needed to implement the provisions of the bill. Moreover, the analysis indicates, it is
unclear whether special licensing will be needed for those who work with deaf
and hard-of-hearing students above the current requirements for those dealing
with special needs children. If this is
the case, the result may create personnel shortages beyond those that now exist
for interpreters for the deaf. Funding
will need to be identified to support training to the individuals cited above
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill requires that
the PED develop a “model communication consideration” form to be used by
individualized program teams who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. The PED reports it has already circulated a
draft “communication consideration” form, has circulated it for reaction from
the stakeholders and plans to finalize and distribute the form by
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
If we already
have 800 regulations on the books, why do we need this “bill of rights”?
2.
How frequently
are formal complaints lodged pursuant the safeguards provided by IDEA?
3.
What would it
cost to add to PED to carry out the provisions of this bill?
LB/lg:dm:yr