Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Health Practitioner Service Gross Receipts |
SB |
179 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY05 |
|
|
|
|
(37,000.0) |
(39,500.0) |
(42,000.0) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
* |
* |
* |
Recurring |
Municipalities |
(2,600.0) |
(2,800.0) |
(3,000.0) |
Recurring |
Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to:
HB 17, Certain Health
Care Services Gross Receipts
HB 80, Gross Receipts
in Health Provider Contracts
HB 154, Health
Practitioner Services Gross Receipts
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
Department of Health (DOH)
Human Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate
Bill 179 amends statute to enact a new section of the Tax Administration Act
and would provide a deduction from gross receipts taxation for eligible
licensed health practitioners for payments received for the commercial portion
of contract services provided by that practitioner. This deduction is limited
to commercial service payments, and expressly excludes managed care payments
under Medicare, Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP).
SB
179 also provides a distribution to municipalities from gross receipts taxes as
an offset for the GRT deductions by licensed health practitioners within the
municipality allowed by Section 2 of the bill. Section 1 provides a formula for
calculating the amount of reimbursement (“deductions claimed…by taxpayers from
business locations attributable to the municipality multiplied by the sum of
the combined rate of all municipal local option gross receipts taxes in effect
in the municipality for the month plus [1.225%].”
Health
care practitioner is defined in SB 179 to include chiropractic physicians,
dentists, dental hygienists, physicians, physician assistants, osteopathic physicians,
osteopathic physician assistants, doctors of oriental medicine, podiatrists,
psychologists, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, registered lay
midwives, optometrists, occupational therapists, respiratory care practitioners,
speech language pathologists and clinical laboratories
Significant Issues
HSD’s Office of General
Counsel has considered the potential impact of 42 U.S.C. § 1396b(w)
if SB 179 were enacted, and concludes that § 1396b(w) would not be implicated.
That section provides that, for purposes of determining the amount of federal
payment for medical assistance, the calculation of the state’s expenditures
will be reduced by the amount of revenue the state received from “health care
related taxes” and most “broad-based health care related taxes.” OGC concludes
that in exempting Medicare and Medicaid MCO payments to practitioners from GRT
deductibility, SB 179 would not create a distinction of a type that would give
rise to an (effective) health care related tax
The Department
of Health notes that many health care providers in
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
* In determining the fiscal impact TRD
notes that SB 179 intends to maintain municipal distributions at the same level
as under current law. However, for
the amendments to work, it is critical that health practitioners report the
exact amount of all deductions attributable to each location. If all health practitioners report correctly,
the provisions contained in this bill will accomplish their purpose. However, as with most changes in tax law,
reporting behavior can be irregular. For example, some taxpayers may treat
deductions (which are required to be reported) as exemptions that are not
subject to reporting requirements. The
actual impact on a specific municipality’s gross receipts tax revenue is
unpredictable.
Under this proposal, municipal distributions are calculated
on a base that includes the value of the proposed health care deductions. This change is not accompanied by a
corresponding increase in the overall state gross receipts tax rate. Thus municipal compensation is financed with
foregone state general fund revenue.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes that the effective date of SB 179 may
not give the agency adequate time to reprogram its systems to adequately
administer the program.
Other bills that propose similar deduction-reporting
schemes for the purpose of calculating local government offsets impose stiff
penalties for under-reporting deduction amounts. A similar provision should be included in
this bill because it is critical that the exact amount of all deductions
attributable to each location be reported correctly in order for the offset
provision to work effectively
POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS
DOH notes that SB 179 does not include behavior
health care practitioner and suggests the following amendment:
On Page 4, after line 15 and before line 16 add
“Licensed Independent Social Workers, Licensed Professional Clinical Counselors
and Licensed Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors.”
SN/lg