Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Carraro |
DATE TYPED |
1/28/04 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Felony DWI Conviction as Prior Conviction |
SB |
99 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See Narrative |
|
|
Relates to HB 94 and SB 144
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts (
Office
of the District Attorneys (
Corrections
Department (CD)
Public
Defender Department (PDD)
Department
of Transportation (DOT)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 99 adds
the felony offenses of driving while intoxicated to the definition of “prior
felony conviction” for purposes of the habitual offender sentencing act, NMSA
1978, section 31-18-17. It makes it an
offense for a person driving a commercial vehicle to have breath or blood
alcohol content of .04. It increases the
penalty for a second DWI conviction to five consecutive days, and if aggravated
DWI, ten consecutive days. Second DWI
offenders must participate in a 30 day inpatient or 60 day outpatient treatment
program.
Significant
Issues
The PDD states the New
Mexico Supreme Court decided in State v. Begay,
2001-NMSC-02, 130 N.M. 61, that felony DWI convictions were not “prior felony
convictions” for purposes of the habitual offender sentencing. In that opinion, the Supreme Court noted that
the DWI increasing sentencing scheme for DWI was itself an enhancement
statute. Because the habitual offender
statute is so highly punitive, using an enhanced DWI conviction to increase a
subsequent felony conviction may result in a double jeopardy challenge. In addition, many of the DWI convictions that
formed the basis for the felony DWI conviction were not counseled. While the New Mexico Supreme Court found
using these convictions to enhance DWI penalties was sufficient, it may not be
the same for enhancing non-DWI felonies.
The DOT states that the provisions of this bill
bring
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Administrative
Office of the Courts (AOC).
The
Corrections Department
(CD).
The CD notes the bill
will increase costs to the CD in later years since there will be a greater
number of offenders sentenced to prisons as habitual offenders. However, the increased penalties may act as a
deterrent, or if the mandatory treatment programs may lower the recidivism
rate, the bill could reduce costs to the CD.
The contract or private
prison annual costs of incarcerating an inmate based upon Fiscal Year 03 actual
expenditures is $20,720 per year for males.
The cost per client to house a female inmate at a privately operated
facility is $26,313 per year. Because
state owned prisons are essentially at capacity, any net increase in inmate
population will be housed at a contract or private facility.
The cost per client in
Probation and Parole for a standard supervision program is $1,452 per
year. The cost per client in Intensive
Supervision programs is $2,852 per year.
The cost per client in department-operated Community Corrections
programs is $4,371 per year. The cost
per client in privately-operated Community Corrections programs is $9,151 per
year. The cost per year for male and
female residential Community Corrections programs is $20,725.
Public Defender
Department (PD).
The PDD is unable to accurately
estimate the exact number of cases. The use
of prior felony DWI's to enhance a subsequent felony
conviction will increase the number of cases that go to trial. First, defense
attorneys will warn clients facing DWI charges that their DWI convictions could
result in substantial increases in penalty in all future cases. (Prior felony
DWI's could in
crease the length of
all future sentences by 1, 4, or 8 years for each new count.) Secondly, the
increased sentences would reduce the number of subsequent cases that are
resolved by plea bargains and increase the number of cases that go to trial.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The
RELATIONSHIP
SB99 relates to HB 94
and SB 144, duplicate bills that also amend Section 66-8-102(NMSA) .
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The DOT works closely
with the Department of Health(DOH) on DWI issues. Currently, DOH has a database that tracks
offenders through the required screening for all DWI offenders. If this bill does not require screening for
all DWI offenders, the database will no longer be useful. The DOT utilizes this database through DOH
for statistics and analysis.
DW/lg:njw