Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Harden |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
|
SB |
95 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$582.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB 72 and HB 132
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
Funding Recommendations For
FY05
Responses
Received From
Not
Response
Commission
on Higher Education
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 95 132 appropriates $582 thousand
from the general fund the Board of Regents
of
Significant Issues
This
bill proposes to addresses water management, dairy specialization, soil science
and general agronomic issues as they impact eastern
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $582 thousand contained in
this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or
unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY05 shall revert to the general
fund.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
NMSU reports that the Cooperative Extension
Service and the Agricultural Experiment Station currently operate facilities in
the
This program expansion was not included in the
NMSU Board of Regents funding recommendations to the CHE. Consequently, the Commission did not
recommend this program for funding.
AMENDMENTS
The following language is suggested for all new
recurring higher education programs and expansion of current programs (assuming
that funding will continue beyond FY05):
“The institution
receiving the appropriation in this bill shall submit a program evaluation to
the Legislative Finance Committee and the Commission on Higher Education by August
2007 detailing the benefits to
the State of
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Was this
program submitted to the NMSU Board of Regents for its consideration:
2.
Why or Why not?
3.
If it was
submitted to the Board of Regents, why wasn’t it included in the funding recommendations
submitted to the CHE?
LB/lg