Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Feldman |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Cancer Clinical Trial Patient Coverage |
SB |
73/aSPAC |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Garcia |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
NFI |
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Public
Regulation Commission, Insurance Divison
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee Amendment
adds the following language: “Section 2.
DELAYED REPEAL.—Section 1 of this act is repealed on
Synopsis of Original Bill
The bill repeals the delayed repeal of required
coverage of patient costs incurred during cancer clinical trials.
Significant Issues
Prior to the passage of Laws 2001, Chapter 27,
Section 1, many insurers excluded from their benefits medical coverage for
individuals who were participating in cancer clinical trials. Patients participating in these trials don’t
usually incur any medical cost associated with the trials. However, they do often incur medical cost
associated with other medical treatment. It is these other costs incurred by
the patients that are required to be covered by Laws 2001, Chapter 27.
Coverage of cancer clinical trials was initially
limited to a three-year trial period.
This trial period was to give interested parties an opportunity to
measure the costs associated with cancer clinical trials.
Proponents of this bill believe the trial period
has not resulted in measurable increased costs and that coverage of cancer
clinical trails should be made permanent.
Those who would oppose
this bill would argue the trial period has measured increased costs that have
driven the cost of health insurance higher.
They would argue the delayed repeal should stay in place.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill has no fiscal impact.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
If the bill is not
enacted, coverage of patient cost incurred during cancer clinical trials will
be repealed effective
DG/lg