Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Garcia, M.J. |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
NMSU Viticulturist |
SB |
72 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$150.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB 52.
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Commission on Higher Education (CHE) Funding
Recommendations for FY05
Responses
Received From
CHE
NMSU,
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 72 appropriates
$150 thousand from the general fund to the Board of Regents of NMSU for a
position and program in viticulture to support the need of
Significant Issues
This proposal responds
to the needs associated with the growing wine industry in
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $150
thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance
remaining at the end of FY05 shall revert to the general fund.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION
In
the “CONFLICT” section, NMSU reports that the Cooperative Extension Service
maintains access to a wide variety of expertise within both extension and the
research faculty working in the Agricultural Experiment Station. Therefore, funding for this initiative would
serve as a productive companion considering the existing expertise in agronomic
science, agricultural economics, and other disciplines within the College of
Agriculture & Home Economics.
HB
52 duplicates SB 72.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This program expansion
request was not submitted by the NMSU Board of Regents to the CHE. Consequently, the Commission did not
recommend funding for this proposal.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Was this
request submitted to the NMSU Board of Regents for their consideration?
2.
Why or Why not?
3.
Is the
information needed by grape growers and wine producers available now from NMSU?
RLG/njw