Fiscal
impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current
FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available
on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Leavell |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Compensation of Auctioneers |
SB |
61/aSCORC |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Aguilar |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|||
|
|
Indeterminate |
Recurring |
State
Road Fund |
|
|
Indeterminate |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC
Files
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT)
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Regulation
and Licensing Department (RLD)
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SCORC Amendment
The
Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee amendment strikes section 1
and inserts language repealing Sections 61-16-1 and 61-16-2 NMSA 1978.
Significant Issues
Section
61-16-1 NMSA 1978 removes penalty and civil liability for puffing and charging
illegal fees.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 61 repeals Section 61-16-1 NMSA
1978.
Significant Issues
Section
61-16-1 NMSA 1978 deals with two specific issues:
1. Makes it unlawful for a
person who is selling at public auction articles of personal property belonging
to others to bid on or to employ others (puffers) to bid on those articles.
2. Sets the maximum fees
allowable to be charged for selling personal property at public auction.
“Puffing”
as used in this section, refers to the process of bidding up the price of a
piece of personal property at auction for the purpose of artificially
increasing the sale price. The department
of transportation notes this portion of the statute should be retained since it
allows market forces and legitimate bidders to determine the price. This language is contained in NMDOT auctioneering
contracts.
NMDODT
reports that this bill removes the payment percentage limits for items sold at
auction. By repealing this without any
language to replace it will allow state agencies such as Public Safety, General
Services and the NMDOT to dictate the commission or payment percentages on each
contract without regulations, limits or standards. This is a concern because auctioneers can be
overpaid or underpaid depending on how the contract is written.
Present
statute allows for the following fees to be charged for auction services:
·
<$200 10%
·
$200
– $500 8%
·
>$500 5%
NMDOT
proposes an alternate payment
commission schedule for consideration.
This schedule has been used by DOT for over 10 years. This schedule is used for NMDOT’s
annual public auction of surplus equipment, autos and heavy-duty
equipment. Although this schedule is provided
for consideration, it is very important to have input from the Department of
Public Safety and the General Services Department since they conduct annual
auctions independent of the NMDOT.
TOTAL SALES (Dollar Value) COMMISSION
UP TO $100,000 10.0%
$100,001 TO $200,000 9.5%
$200,001 TO $300,000 9.0%
$300.001 TO $400,000 8.5%
$400,001 TO $500,000 8.0%
$500,001 TO $600,000 7.5%
$600,001 TO $700,000 7.0%
$700,001 TO $800,000 6.5%
$800,001 TO $900,000 6.0%
$900,001 TO $1,000,000
+ 5.5%
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
The revenue impact is indeterminate at this time.
However it is expected to be significant if caps on auctioneering fees are
eliminated.
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
NMDOT notes the
current auctioneer contract with NMDOT will be out of compliance since its
contract is still valid for another three years with the old payment
percentages in place as per statute.
NMDOT is in contact with its legal office to determine if the contract
would become invalid if this section is repealed.
PA/prr