Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
SPAC |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Health Care Registry Act |
SB |
9/SPACS |
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$50.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB245
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
Human
Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Public Affairs
Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 9 appropriates $50,000 from the General
Fund for FY 05 and subsequent fiscal years for the Department of Health (DOH)
to create, maintain and administer a registry of employees determined guilty of
abuse, neglect or misappropriation of property. Its purpose is to ensure the safety of
individuals who are developmentally disabled, physically disabled and/or
elderly and who are receiving care through a community provider.
Oversight of
developmentally disabled providers is administered by the DOH.
Oversight of service
providers to the disabled and elderly, and the Personal Care Option Attendant
Program are administered through the Human Services Department. Included in the bill is
q
the requirement to check the Registry
prior to hiring any individual or entering into or renewing any contract;
q
the prohibition to hire anyone listed in
the Registry; a “hold harmless” clause for failure to hire or retain an
employee listed on the registry;
q
the authority to investigate abuse, neglect,
or exploitation (ANE), and
q
to hold fair hearings for those accused
of perpetrating ANE.
Significant Issues
The Committee Substitute for SB9 addresses the
major concern HSD expressed regarding HSD’s precise role in its previous
analysis of the original bill.
Section 3(F) of the Committee Substitute allows
HSD the option of not entering into or renewing a contract with all providers
of services to the affected population, including personal care option
providers, if they fail to comply with the Act’s requirements that they not
hire or contract with an employee included in the registry. HSD would be required to execute a memorandum
of understanding (MOU) or joint powers agreement (JPA) with DOH in order to
have access to the health care registry.
The Committee Substitute offers HSD a useful
tool to ensure that HSD providers are ensuring the safety and well being of the
Medicaid clients they serve.
The substitute clarifies definitions for abuse,
neglect and misappropriation of property, deletes managed care organizations
except for providing respite, makes technical language changes such as deleting
the term “governmental entities”,
clarifies the process to determine abuse, neglect and misappropriation of
property, and clarifies the fair hearing process. The Substitute addresses the
concerns expressed by DOH in its previous analysis.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of
$50.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the General Fund. Any
unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of a Fiscal Year shall not revert to the General Fund.
The language as
written permits the department to keep fund balances remaining in subsequent
fiscal years. DOH recognizes there will
be costs for increases in the fair hearing process and the increased workload
to investigate reports of abuse, neglect and exploitation.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If the bill is enacted, HSD would be required to enter into an MOU or JPA to gain access to the registry. In addition, HSD’s current policy for community providers needs to be revised to mandate provider compliance with the Act. HSD is required to create a quality assurance process to ensure that providers check the registry prior to hiring potential services providers. HSD would also need to establish a process to verify that potential providers are not on the registry prior to contracting with them.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
HSD points out since Section IV (C) (5) provides
an employee’s failure to request a hearing within 30 days will result in the
employee’s name being placed on the registry, it creates a potential loophole
in the system that would allow an individual to obtain employment with another
agency during the 30-day waiting period.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill expands the
definition section to define abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property.
These are the federal definitions used in other programs involving federal
funds.
Section 3 (G)
includes the word “reports” when describing acts that are protected from liability,
not just persons who refuse to hire a person listed on the Registry. This
section also expands the discussion of immunity for reporting and utilizing the
Registry to specify that a provider acting in good faith is immune from both
civil and criminal liability. A provider acting in bad faith or with malicious
purpose is specifically denied immunity from liability.
Section 3 (H)
now grants all persons listed on the Registry the opportunity to petition for removal
from the Registry after a period of five years. The previous version permitted
a petition after one year for neglect cases only. This is an important
clarification of an inadvertent omission from the original draft.
Section 4 (A)
states that the Department will review the reports of abuse, neglect or misappropriation
of property it receives from CYFD, APS or other protective agencies. It does
not direct the Department to wait till the protective agency has completed
their investigation to proceed.
Section 4, (D)
is a new provision that mandates the Department to phase in the Registry beginning
July 1, 2004 for providers to adults and children with developmental disabilities,
by July 1, 2005 for providers to adults and children with physical disabilities
and providers to the elderly by July 1, 2005, and to personal care attendants
funded through the Medicaid program by July 1, 2006.
BD/yr:lg