Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
397/aHGUAC |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
|
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Garcia |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Public
Regulation Commission
No
Responses
Department
of Finance and Administration
Association
of Counties
SUMMARY
Synopsis of
HGUAC Amendment
The House Government and Urban Affairs Committee
Amendment inserts new language in the bill. On page 4,
line 4, the amendment adds the following language: “provided that if more than
one Indian nation, tribe or pueblo is located within the territory comprising
the territory of the authority, each Indian nation, tribe or pueblo that is not
represented on the board may appoint an ex-officio nonvoting representative to
the board.” The amendment stipulates if Indian land is located within the
boundaries of the newly created authority, the Indian pueblo or tribe may appoint
a nonvoting member to the authority board.
On page 13, line 11, the HGUAC Amendment also
adds the following language: “except territory located within municipal limits,
territory that is under the jurisdiction of a municipality or territory
currently served, or that could be served, by a municipal water or sanitation
utility, consistent with all the powers and authorities granted pursuant to
Chapter 3, Articles 26 and 27 NMSA 1978 and related statutes.” This language
limits the territory the
Synopsis of Original Bill
The bill establishes a water and sewer authority
for Class A counties with a population of over 125,000 persons according to the
last decennial census and having an assessed value of over $3.7 billion.
The bill spells out the organization authority
and debt issuance authority of the newly created special districts. The bill
states that a board of five directors from the county where the special
district is created is the governing body. Three of the directors will be
elected among citizens of the particular county and the remaining two directors
will be appointed by the board of county commissioners. Initial directors will
all be appointed by the county commission. The board has all powers and duties
vested in them on the operations of the Water and Sanitation Authority. The
bill also states the Authority is created as a political subdivision and has
the power similar to other political subdivisions.
Section 9.A states that a
county authority created under this new statute may claim all service territory
of the following: “The initial service area of a county water and sanitation
authority…may consist of the territorial limits of the county in which an
authority is established except the territory encompassed within a
municipality, an existing water and sanitation district or the territory
actually served on the effective date of the County Water and Sanitation
Authority Act by an existing mutual domestic consumer water association. A county water and sanitation authority shall
have the exclusive right to provide water and sanitation services within the
territory served by that authority.”
The bill also goes on to set the terms and
authorization of issuing revenue bonds. The bill states revenue bonds can be
issued for “acquiring real and personal property needed for an authority
project, including the purchase of water rights, etc.” The revenue bonds will
be tax exempt and will not be issued under the state’s credit rating, but the
rating of the special district.
Lastly, the bill allows the
Significant Issues
1) Section 9.A. of this act would allow a
county water and sanitation authority created under the act to claim exclusive
right to service territory within the entire county, notwithstanding that area
already served by a municipality, water & sanitation district, or mutual
domestic water consumer association. According to the PRC, not only would this infringe on the service
areas of other water and/or sewer systems not included in the exclusory
language, it would permanently prohibit any further expansion of any other
system including municipalities, water and sanitation districts, and mutual domestic
water consumer associations.
2) An authority created under this act would
have the power to force any resident to tie into the authority’s sanitation
system within 60 days, with no recourse, whether this is against the resident’s
wishes or ability to pay. The authority
would have the right to place a lien on any resident’s property to pay for a
connection to the system, without need to request the right to place such a
lien from any court or other authority.
3) Section 8.S. of this act gives a
county water and sanitation authority created under the act the power of
eminent domain and condemnation of private property necessary for the exercise
of the powers granted to the authority.
4) Section 10 of this act gives a county
water and sanitation authority created under the act the authority to issue
revenue bonds for acquiring real and personal property. NMSA 1978, §
Section 15 of this act
provides that revenue bonds issued by a
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill has no direct fiscal impact to the
state. However, it is unclear how or if the bill will effect
municipal and county utilities funding and financing other than defining bond
issuance and governing structures.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill does not mention the service
“The following are declared to be the objects and purposes of this 1991 act. Experience has proven that the construction, development and extension of proper plants and facilities cannot be accomplished without unnecessary duplication and economic waste within areas certificated to water and sewer utilities without controls against duplicative intrusions into certificated areas by municipal utilities. A rational basis exists to prohibit intrusion of municipal water or sewer facilities or service into areas in which a public utility furnishes regulated services until that municipality elects to come within the terms of the Public Utility Act, in which event both systems will be brought into parity of treatment with respect to the commission’s independent jurisdiction and power to prevent unreasonable interference between competing plants, lines and systems. Without such controls as provided by Section 62-9-1.1 NMSA 1978, the declared policy of the Public Utility Act, the provision of reasonable and proper utility services at fair, just and reasonable rates and the general welfare, business and industry of the state may be frustrated.” [§62-3-2.1 C., NMSA 1978.]
A county water and sanitation authority created
under this statute would have no such constraints and would apparently be able
to encroach into a public utility’s service area with impunity.
DG/lg