Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Stewart |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
243 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Minimum
Teacher Salary Phase-in |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$26,325.0 |
|
See Narrative |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
Relates to the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The bill accelerates the scheduled base salary
phase-in tied to licensure levels for teachers by two years. Level II teachers
would receive $40 thousand guaranteed base pay in FY05. Level III teachers would receive $50 thousand guaranteed
base pay in FY06. The bill also amends
language in the law to read that requirements must be met pursuant to
department-approved criteria instead of state board-approved.
Significant Issues
According
to the PED, the “high objective uniform standard of [teacher] evaluation” goes
into effect on
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HB 243 does not contain an appropriation. However, the PED projects a recurring expense
to the general fund of $26,325 million to implement the Level II provisions of
the bill in FY05. The expense will be recurring. Costs to accelerate the Level III tier are
indeterminate because the effects of “grandfathering” existing teachers in
Level III are unknown. Consequently, the
previous estimate of $10, 376.5 becomes the best but uncertain estimate.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The PED reports that:
“Moving up the
implementation of salary increases would bring additional pressure on the
Public Education Department (PED) to get all components of the new teacher
evaluation system in place and train all administrators quickly on the new
system. Public school administrators
would also have to evaluate all Level II and Level III teachers on the new
standards in 2004-2005 while also evaluating all Level I teachers as a matter
of course. That means all teachers in
LB/yr:lg