Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Vigil |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
171 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Educational Retiree Service Credit Purchases |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Garcia |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
– See Narrative |
Recurring |
ERB
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Public
Education Department (PED)
Educational
Retirement Board (ERB)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The bill amends a paragraph and a
subparagraph of Section
Significant Issues
1) The
cost to purchase military service represents a small part of the cost to
provide the years of retirement. With the purchase being within the first three
years of employment, there are many years of investing to cover the cost of
service. However, the bill, according to ERB, opens up the purchase of this
service at the end or middle of a member’s career at a lower cost. Without the
years of compound investing, ERB will not receive the funding necessary to pay
for the military service granted. Thus, the ERB Fund has additional liabilities
it must fund in the future that will not be fully paid for by the purchase.
2)
According to ERB, military service has been a career choice with the
advent of a volunteer military over the past thirty years. ERB is concerned
that other careers will seek to be able to purchase service credit at a low
cost. Many of the educators and support staff had careers and jobs prior to joining
an education employer. ERB has received requests to purchase service credit
without any previous work (this is called air-time), or with some other
government service such as federal employment, state, or city employment in
other states. To open up military service would bring many requests for other
service purchases.
3)
Currently, ERB allows service purchases for service in public schools
and universities in other states. The price to purchase such service is at
“actuarial cost.” This actuarial cost is the present value of the total cost to
the ERB Fund for the purchase of the service. With this cost there is no
additional liability to the ERB Fund. All service credit purchases for the
education retirement system are available at actuarial cost.
4)
According to ERB, the bill violates the
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
According to ERB, the costs of enacting the
bill are high and will create additional liabilities to the ERB Fund, which is
already experiencing a significant solvency problem. The bill will encourage
other groups to seek subsidized service credit purchases and contribute to the
further erosion of the ERB Fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Enacting the bill will
likely result in a surge of requests for calculations and counseling. This may
require additional temporary staff.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The
amendment to Subparagraph (d), Paragraph (4), Subsection A of Section 22-11-34
NMSA 1978, merely substitutes “public
education department” for “state board” where a reference is made to accreditation
of a private school or institution of higher learning in New Mexico.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
Furthermore, the
actuaries have calculated that roughly an additional $110 million in recurring
money is required into the fund to bring the amortization period back down to
the GASB standard of 30 years. Consequently, any benefit enhancements into the
ERA system will further erode the solvency of the fund and detract from the
ability of the ERB to get a handle on its enormous unfunded liability.
DG/njw