Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Heaton |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
120 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
“Student” In Teacher Loan For Service Act |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to SB 147
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Public Education Department (PED)
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
SUBMITTED FOR THE LESC
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 120 amends the Teacher Loan for
Service Act to include high school and community college students who sign an
agreement declaring their intent to serve as a public school teacher in a
designated teacher shortage area in
Significant Issues
A significant issue revolves around the
availability of funding to allow grants to all who have applied pursuant to the
requirements of the Act. The PED and CHE
report that current funding enables the CHE to fund only 70% of applicants who
had either enrolled in, or been accept to, a teacher preparation program.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill does not carry on appropriation and,
therefore, has no immediate impact on the general fund. CHE and the PED report current funding is
insufficient for the identified need. The program’s success may well depend on
the program being fully funded.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
In its analysis, the CHE points
out the bill does not address three significant issues:
AMENDMENTS
The following language is suggested for all new
recurring higher education programs and expansion of current programs (assuming
that funding will continue beyond FY05):
“The institution
receiving the appropriation in this bill shall submit a program evaluation to
the Legislative Finance Committee, the Public Education Department and the Commission
on Higher Education by August 2007 detailing the benefits to the State of
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
LB/lg:dm