Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Swisstack |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
106/aHEC |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Enforcement of Habitual Truancy |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Public Education Department (PED)
Children,
Youth and Families Department (CYFD)
Department
of the Public Defender (DPD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The House Education Committee amendment to
HB106:
Changes “hearing officer” on page 5, line 21 to
“special master” .
Reinstate the original penalty for first
conviction of parents to a minimum of $25.00.
Correct language for imprisonment on page 6,
line 16 to read “imprisonment for a period”.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House Bill 106 creates a new section of the
Compulsory School Attendance Act (NMSA 1978, §§ 22-12-1 through –8), defines
“unexcused absence”, “truant” and
“habitual truant” provides for early identification of unexcused absences and
truancy, requires early intervention procedures be developed, provides for the
enforcement of habitual truancy laws, and provides penalties for the parents or
guardians of habitual truants.
Significant Issues
The
PED reports that while dropout rates have decreased on a statewide basis,
unexcused absences and truancy continue to have higher than desired rates. Because the correlation between dropout rates
and truancy is high, this bill is predicated on the notion that lowering
absences will help lower the dropout rate. (See Other Substantive issues for
details of bill’s provisions.)
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
HB
106 amends the Compulsory School Attendance Law (NMSA 1978, §§
22-12-2) as
shown below:
1.
Adding
a new section for Unexcused Absences and Truancy – Attendance Policies that:
a.
Defines
“habitual truant,” “truant” and “unexcused absence”
b.
Requires
each school district to maintain an attendance policy that provides for early
identification of students with unexcused absences, truants and habitual
truants
c.
Requires
that class attendance be taken for every instructional day
d.
Requires
school districts to report truancy and habitual truancy rates to the Public
Education Department (PED).
e.
2.
Amends
NMSA 1978, §
a.
Require
local school boards and governing authorities of private schools to enforce the
provisions of the Compulsory School Attendance Law for students enrolled in
their respective schools
b.
Require
local school boards or governing authorities of private schools or their authorized
representative, in order to initiate enforcement, to give written notice of habitual
truancy by certified mail or by personal service to the parent, guardian or custodian
of the student if there is noncompliance of the Compulsory School Attendance
Law
c.
Require
reporting of a student’s unexcused absences to the local court probation department
d.
Grant
the juvenile probation officer the sole responsibility for determining cause
and making referrals to the district attorney’s office or any law enforcement
agency having jurisdiction for appropriate investigation and the filing of
charges
e.
Confer
jurisdiction upon magistrate court or district court to hear cases, permitting
a hearing officer to hear charges if filed in a district court
f.
Increase
fines for those convicted of violating the act for a first offense from a
former range of $25-$100 to $100 or imprisonment for a definite term not to
exceed 90 days or both
g.
Provide
for imprisonment for second or subsequent offenses for a definite term not to
exceed six months.
3.
Amending
NMSA 1978, §
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill does not contain an appropriation.
Costs for developing enforcement policies and procedures will be borne by
school districts. The fiscal and
administrative impact on the courts, if any, is not known.
RS/njw:lg:dm