Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
HJC |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
94/HJCS |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
DWI Amendment Reconciliation |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Bransford |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
Indeterminate |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB 144 and SB 207
Conflicts with SB 99
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Attorney
General (AG)
Corrections
Department (CD)
Department
of Transportation (DOT)
Public
Defender Department (PDD)
Administrative
Office of the Courts (
Department
of Public Safety (DPS)
Department
of Health (DOH)
Administrative
Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The House Judiciary Committee Substitute for
House Bill 94 reenacts the amendments signed into law during the 2003 session,
but repealed by a subsequent bill and contains an emergency clause. The legislation increases the penalties for
driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI) and creates
new penalties for subsequent convictions.
It also expands elements of aggravated DWI, provides sanctions for probation
violations, and mandates and clarifies treatment provisions for offenders. Specifically the amendments to Section
66-8-102 NMSA 1978:
Significant Issues
DOT reports that if
New Mexico does not comply with federal law requiring blood/breath alcohol
concentration of .04 for a person driving a commercial vehicle the Department’s
Federal Highway Construction Fund will be withheld at a rate of 5 percent or
$8.4 million the first year and 10 percent or $16.8 million each year after.
The Motor
Transportation Division (MTD) reports that failure to comply with federal commercial
driver requirements may result in a loss of federal funds for enforcement as
well.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Corrections Department reports that
implementing the bill will have an indeterminate fiscal impact on the
department because it will be required to provide substance abuse treatment to
felony DWI offenders in its custody or on probation and parole. The bill will also result in longer and
perhaps more prison sentences.
The PDD and DAs report that as penalties
increase more cases will go to trial. However,
both agree that it is impossible to predict future caseloads and therefore
neither is requesting additional resources at this time.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
CONFLICT AND RELATIONSHIP
This legislation relates to SB 144 and SB
207. It conflicts with SB 99 in the
penalties for second convictions (five days for a second offense, 10 days for
aggravated second offense). SB99 has no
provision for fifth, sixth or seventh convictions. The bills all require treatment for second
and third convictions but SB 99 requires 30 days inpatient and 60 days outpatient
treatment. SB 99 does not require CD to
provide substance abuse counseling or treatment.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The AG reports that passing this bill will
clarify legislative intent at issue in the State v. Anaya where the Supreme
Court ultimately ruled that legislative intent was not clear and therefore a
special kind of felony had been created not subject to habitual offender
enhancement. This bill does not treat
DWI repeat felony offenders the same as all other repeat felony offenders for
purposes of habitual offender enhanced penalties.
VB/dm:yr