Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Beam |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
83 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Tobacco Delivery Sales Act |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Neel |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
Non-recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|
|
|
|
|
(See Narrative) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
Recurring |
NM
Finance Authority |
|
|
|
Recurring |
Recreation
Fund |
|
|
|
Recurring |
Cigarette
Fund |
|
|
|
Recurring |
|
|
|
|
Recurring |
UNM |
|
|
|
Recurring |
GSD |
|
|
|
Recurring |
Credit
Enhancement Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to:
HB 59, Increase
Tobacco Products Tax
HB 86, Tobacco Stamp
Procedure Changes
HB 220, Tobacco
Settlement Revenue Appropriation
SB 192, Smart Moves
Smoking Cessation Program Funding
HM 1, Promote Cigarette Taxation Parity
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Humans Services Department (HSD)
No Responses Received From:
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House
Bill 83 enacts the Tobacco Delivery Sales Act regarding definitions, general
provisions, age verification, shipping requirements, maximum delivery amounts,
registration of sellers, reporting and confidentiality requirements, collection
of taxes, penalties, enforcement and appropriation. HB 83 would regulate tobacco sales ordered in
writing, by telephone, and through the Internet, and delivered by seller via
Significant
Issues
There is a growing trend in cigarette sales via the Internet to avoid state excise taxes and enforcement of verification of age. Internet sales are a route increasingly chosen by underage consumers.
The Health Policy Commission proved the
following statistics on under-age smoking:
·
The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids,
utilizing data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-2001 and
2002 data, notes the following statistics for
36.2%
(41,000) of NM High School students smoke cigarettes. Kids (under 18) in
·
National youth smoking rates have
declined somewhat since 1997, but remain at historically high levels. According to the National Youth Tobacco
Survey, 28.4% of all
·
In
·
2,100
·
90%
of all smoking adults began smoking in adolescence.
·
The
American Journal of Public Health notes that minors were sold cigarettes by
vending machines in bars 77% of the time, in private clubs 80% of the time, in
restaurants 88% of the time and in gas stations 99% of the time.
·
According
to the World Health Organization, 42% of young people
who smoke as few as three cigarettes go on to become regular smokers.
·
Studies have found that about
three-fourths of under-age smokers in the
·
On average, smokers who begin smoking in
adolescence and continue to smoke regularly have a 50% chance of dying from
tobacco. Half of these will die in middle age, before age seventy, losing
around 22 years of normal life expectancy. Therefore, a lifelong smoker is as
likely to die as a direct result of tobacco use as from all other potential
causes of death combined.
The
following was excerpted from the November/December 2003 edition of State Government News:
As
part of Phase I of the MSA, tobacco manufacturers that signed on the agreement
are required to make annual payments to state governments in perpetuity. It was originally estimated that over the
first 25 years of the agreement, the cumulative total of those payments would
be approximately $200 billion.
The
base amounts are subject annually to three adjustments: inflation accounting
for the change in the value of a dollar each year; volume, ensuring that
payments to the states are based on the total number of cigarettes sold by the
participating manufacturers; and market share, to take account of gains in the
market share by companies that haven’t signed the MSA….
The
size of the volume reduction has grown by 14 percent in 2000 to more than 23
percent in 2003. … By 2018 more than
half of each annual payment will be lost to volume adjustments. Two trends are responsible for this volume
decline. First, cigarette consumption is
down. Fewer people are smoking, and
those who continue to smoke are smoking less.
The
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HB 83 appropriates $100.0 to TRD to implement
provisions of the act. Any unexpended or
unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY05 will revert to the general
fund.
HB 83 encourages increased compliance with the
Cigarette Tax Act. However, precise mechanisms
to collect such taxes may be suspect and therefore the fiscal impact may be indeterminate.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Senate
Bill 804 (Chapter 341) increases the cigarette tax from the current 21 cents
per pack to 91 cents per pack and authorizes the New Mexico Finance Authority
(NMFA) to issue revenue bonds with a term of up to 15 years for no more than
$60 million for the University of New Mexico Health Science Center (UNMHSC) and
the Cancer Research and Treatment Center. The bill also authorizes the issuance
of revenue bonds for Department of Health facilities. Cigarette tax
distributions to current beneficiaries are amended to hold them harmless;
however, new distributions are made to NMFA (for the benefit UNMHSC and
Department of Health facilities) and a credit enhancement account as a
contingency if cigarette tax revenues decline and impact the state’s ability to
service the authorized bonds. After the distributions, the remaining revenue is
distributed to the general fund; the FY04 gain to the general fund is estimated
at approximately $31 million.
·
Annual health care costs in
·
Total economic losses due to tobacco
related illnesses in 2002 are estimated to be $157 billion (American Cancer
Society). Tobacco and second hand smoke result in over 2,100 deaths a year in
·
Smoking costs the
·
In
2003,
·
According to the Campaign for
Tobacco-Free Kids, for every dollar spent to reduce tobacco use, $3 is saved in
future health care costs.
·
Analysis of 57 studies showed that when
counseling was added to nicotine replacement therapies, results were better
than those of using nicotine replacement alone.
·
A Canadian study notes that among teens
who tried to quit smoking using a government funded program Quit for Life, over
21% reported that they stopping smoking after six months and another 12%
after 12 months.
Tobacco-Free Kids
Statistics (www.tobaccofreekids.org)
· Average state cigarette tax as
· Tobacco state average as
· Non-tobacco state average as
· Studies show that higher cigarette taxes
are an effective ways to reduce smoking among both youth and adults. A 10 percent
increase in the price of cigarettes will reduce youth smoking by about seven
percent and overall cigarette consumption by three to five percent.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Is the $100 thousand
appropriation adequate to fully cover the mandates included in HB 83?
SN/yr:njw