Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Stell |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
60a/HBIC |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Water Conservation Gross Receipts |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
|
|
|
(180.0) |
(190.0) |
Increasing |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(120.0) |
(125.0) |
Increasing |
Recurring |
Local
Gov. |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to:
SB 12, Agricultural Water Conservation Tax
Credit;
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Department of Agriculture
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
No
Responses Received From
Office
of State Engineer (OSE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HBIC
Amendment
The House Business and Industry Committee
amendment changes the original GRT exemption to a deductions, and requires
certification of water conserving irrigation technologies to qualify for the
proposed deduction.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 60 amends statute to exempt from
gross receipts tax the sale and installation of water conservation equipment
for irrigation of agricultural land. The
State Engineer and Interstate Stream Commission with
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS (Amendment)
TRD notes the following assumptions in
determining the fiscal impact:
Irrigation expenditures are a major category of
spending for farm operations in
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS (Original bill)
The following analysis is from identical
legislation (HB 481) introduced in the 2003 session:
TRD relied on data from the Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey conducted by
the United States Department of Agriculture reports that
further assumes non-agricultural irrigation equipment expenditures total
approximately $3 million. Of the $17
million total irrigation expenditures, 12% ($2 million) is assumed to be on
qualified technologies.
TECHNICAL
ISSUES
·
TRD notes that if this proposal is meant to be an
agriculturally based exemption, then language should be added to clarify the
point.
SN/yr:prr