Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Adair |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Increase Civil Action Jurisdictional Amount |
SB |
626 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Koplik |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The bill increases the
jurisdictional amount for civil actions in metropolitan court and magistrate
court from $10 thousand to $25 thousand.
Significant
Issues.
According to the
Administrative Office of the Courts, it is probable, but not certain,
that this bill would increase civil filings in magistrate court since $25
thousand is the minimum required amount of automobile insurance. This proposed change would make it possible
for more insurance cases to be heard in magistrate court. Plaintiffs might choose to file more cases
involving the minimum amount of automobile insurance because procedures are
simpler in magistrate court than in district court.
Some attorneys have
expressed frustration that insurance companies can use the range of discovery
and other civil procedures to drag out cases in district court to complicate
litigation of small-dollar cases, thereby discouraging lawsuits. Last summer at the New Mexico State Bar convention,
the opinion was expressed that more cases involving the minimum amount of insurance
would be filed if they could be filed in magistrate court.
The judiciary does not
know the number of insurance cases currently filed in district court seeking
damages of $25 thousand or less because its database does not contain
information about the amount of damages sought in any particular case.
Previously raising
jurisdictional limits has had no clear effect of increasing or decreasing civil
filings in magistrate court. Listed
below are the numbers of new civil filings for fiscal years, excluding landlord-tenant
cases:
FY 1997 16,830
FY 1998 15,637
FY 1999 13,526
FY 2000 13,148 (First year jurisdictional limit raised to $7.5
thousand)
FY 2001 15,126 (First year jurisdictional limit raised to $10
thousand)
FY 2002 15,188
FY 2003 14,188
This information comes
from the judiciary’s annual reports.
Reports from FY 1997-2002 are posted on www.nmcourts.com. The report for FY 2003 is available from the
It seems likely this
bill will increase civil filings because it will transfer the subset of small insurance
cases from district court to magistrate court.
Magistrate courts have not experienced a significant increase in civil
caseload after the last increase in jurisdictional amount. Since this increase could result in more
insurance cases being heard in magistrate court, civil filings could go up.
FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
There will be a minimal
administrative cost for statewide update, distribution, and documentation of
statutory changes. Any additional fiscal
impact on the magistrate courts would be proportional to any increased case
load. Increased caseload will require additional
resources. There would be an
administrative impact on the court resulting from added judicial and clerical
time needed to dispose of additional cases.
SK/yr