Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Sanchez, M |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
State Engineer Water Rights Hearing Changes |
SB |
383/aSFl#1 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
State
Engineer’s Office (SEO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SFl Amendment #1
The Senate Floor Amendment #1 removes the
requirement that any person, firm or corporation or other entity objecting to
the granting of an application must show substantial and specific impairment in
order to have standing.
Synopsis of Original
Bill
Senate Bill 383 amends
the law to eliminate the currently mandatory requirement that hearing examiners
appointed by the SEO be knowledgeable in “water engineering” and requires
instead hearing officers to have knowledge of “water engineering or hydrology”,
but only “if necessary”.
This bill clarifies that
administrative hearings shall generally be conducted in accordance with the
Rules of Civil Procedure.
This bill states that
the objections of protestants of water rights
applications must describe specifically how the granting of the application
will substantially impair the protestant’s water right in order for the
protestant to have standing. State
government entities would remain substantially exempt from this standing
requirement.
Significant Issues
In order to have standing, protestants must show
specifically that the granting of a water rights application by the SEO will
substantially impair the protestant’s existing water right. State-government protestants
objecting to the granting of the application because it would be contrary to conservation
of water, or detrimental to public welfare, would continue to be exempt from
this standing requirement.
The SEO believes this bill will help
water rights applicants by eliminating non-substantive or frivolous protests to
water rights applications, and thus expediting the water rights permitting
process.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
By helping to expedite the water rights
permitting process, enactment of SB 383 may reduce the costs of the hearing
process.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Enactment of SB 383
would help water rights applicants by eliminating non-substantive or frivolous
protests to water rights applications, thus expediting the water rights
permitting process. By helping to
expedite the water rights permitting process, enactment of SB 383 may reduce
the costs of the hearing process.
DW/yr:dm