Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Additional 4th District Judge |
SB |
338 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Koplik |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$264.3 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
$35.7 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to
HB 130 – Additional
Judge in 13th District
HB 176 - Additional
Judgeships
HB 285 - Additional
Santa Fe Magistrate Judge
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 338
appropriates $300 thousand from the general fund to the 4th Judicial
District Court for an additional judge.
The additional judgeship
shall be filled by appointment by the governor pursuant to the provisions of
Article 6 of the Constitution of New Mexico.
The bill amends NMSA 1978, §34-6-7 to add an additional judge in the
Fourth Judicial District, for a total of three district judges.
Significant Issues
The Administrative
Office of the Courts states that although the Weighted Caseload Study indicates
that the 4th Judicial District needs an additional judge, the court
does not have the space to house an additional judge at this time. The two judges of the district are working
with
Furthermore, the Administrative
Office of the Courts states that the Chief Judges Council reviewed all district,
metropolitan, and magistrate judgeship requests statewide and considered both
the need as determined by the Weighted Caseload Study as well as additional
narrative and testimonial information.
The Council voted to support three district court judgeships in the 9th,
11th, and 13th Judicial Districts,
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation
contained in this bill is a recurring expense of $264.3 thousand and a
non-recurring expense of $35.7 to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining
at the end of FY 2005 shall revert to the general fund.
No appropriations have
been made for the expense of an additional district attorney or public defender.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The court administration will need to work with
the county to find space for this additional judge.
SK/yr