Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
|
Female Inmate Release & Reintegration
Program |
SB |
309 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Reynolds-Forte |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$1,500.0 |
|
|
Recurring
|
General
Fund |
|
|
|
Indeterminate
cost savings |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|||
|
Minimal |
Minimal |
Recurring |
Other
State Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SB 309 duplicates HB 63
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Corrections
Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 309 appropriates $1.5 million from
the general fund to the Corrections Department in FY 05 to operate a
“controlled release and reintegration” program for female inmates to be located
in the Rio Grande Corridor.
The
bill further states that “In the alternative, the corrections department may
reallocate existing resources to operate the program for female inmates.”
Significant Issues
The
Corrections Department defined the following issues related to SB 309:
The phrase “controlled release” is not defined
by statute nor does it have a generally accepted meaning. The Corrections Department has used the
phrase, in preliminary discussion on a proposed policy, to mean the release of
inmates before completion of their prison sentence.
On one hand, the
release of inmates before completion of their basic prison sentence should perhaps
be used only as a last resort when prison population is over capacity. This is due to the fact that there will
always be a public outcry if the inmate who was released early commits a
serious crime during that period of time that that offender would have
otherwise remained in prison. Currently,
the women’s prison is not over capacity.
Also, since non-violent offenders may already reduce their prison
sentences by almost one-half, releasing an inmate even earlier could undermine
the public’s confidence in the criminal justice system.
On the other
hand, most female inmates tend to be non-violent offenders and in that sense
are less of a threat to public safety.
It is possible that the early release of some female inmates could reduce
costs to the state and the Corrections Department (by lowering the prison
population and related per diem costs), without an undue rise to public safety.
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
SB 309 appropriates
$1.5 million from the general fund to the Corrections Department in FY05 to operate
a controlled release and reintegration program for female inmates. Any
unencumbered or unexpended funds at the end of FY05 are to revert to the
general fund.
The
Corrections Department states that they will use the appropriation to obtain
whatever reintegration program services can be obtained for $1.5 million.
Implementation
of the program could result in some costs savings since it would probably
reduce the female prison population, which would result in a lower per diem
payment to the private prison operator. The
Department of Corrections pays on a sliding scale per day for housing female
inmates at the New Mexico Women’s Correctional Facility. In FY05, they will pay $57.64 per day for the
first 322 female inmates at the women’s facility, $49.90 per day for 323-516 female
inmates and $12.42 per day for any female inmates over 516. It is impossible to estimate cost savings
until the program is designed and implemented.
The
Department estimates they might see minimal increased revenues from probation
and parole fees collected if additional female inmates are being supervised due
to this new program.
DUPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 309 duplicates House Bill 63
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The
Corrections Department believes that HB 63 suggests they implement a new
reintegration program. This will result
in increased administrative requirements for the Department personnel required
to administer the program.
POSSIBLE
QUESTIONS
1. Line 20 of the bill states that
in the alternative, the department could reallocate existing funds to operate
the program. If they were to use
existing funds to operate the female reintegration program, for what would the
$1.5 million appropriation be used?
PRF/prr:yr:lg