Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes.

 

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).  Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR

Aragon

DATE TYPED

01/30/04

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE

Home Loan Protection Act Loans

SB

228

 

 

ANALYST

Kehoe

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY04

FY05

FY04

FY05

NFI

 

 

 

 

NFI

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority (MFA)

 

SUMMARY

 

Synopsis of Bill

 

Senate Bill 228 repeals a section of the Home Loan Protection Act concerning claims against certain persons.

 

Significant Issues

 

Senate Bill 228 proposes to repeal a section of the Home Loan Protection Act which took effect January 1, 2004, that states if the borrower of a manufactured home loan or home improvement loan determines he or she has fallen victim to abusive lending practices, he or she may file damages against the originator of the loan as well as any subsequent purchaser, servicer, or other assignee.  Damages are limited to “amounts required to extinguish the borrower’s liability under the home loan, plus the total amount paid by the borrower in connection with the transaction, plus amounts required to recover costs, including reasonable attorney fees.”

 

According to MFA, financial institutions that originate, purchase, service, or otherwise play a role in manufactured housing lending and/or home improvement loans are unwilling to participate in these kinds of transactions because they cannot justify the potential liability associated with them.  While it is true that many state- and federally-chartered institutions benefit from certain preemptions granted by the Office of Thrift Supervision and Financial Institutions Division, these institutions state that the preemptions typically do not extend to loans they purchase, service, or receive as an assignee.  Repeal of Section 7 would significantly limit the assignee liability associated with these types of loans and may restore markets for these loans.

 

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

 

One of MFA’s master servicers, Charter Bank, suspended purchases of MFA loans secured by manufactured homes as a result of the existing Section 7.  Repeal of Section 7 would likely allow Charter Bank to resume manufactured home loan purchases under MFA’s first-time homebuyer programs.  Although manufactured home loans do not comprise a significant portion of MFA’s single family mortgage loan portfolio, they do represent an affordable housing alternative for many New Mexico families.

 

LMK/yr