Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
|
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Home Loan Protection Act Loans |
SB |
228 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Kehoe |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
NFI |
|
|
|
|
NFI |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 228 repeals a section of the Home
Loan Protection Act concerning claims against certain persons.
Significant Issues
Senate Bill 228 proposes to repeal a section of
the Home Loan Protection Act which took effect January 1, 2004, that states if
the borrower of a manufactured home loan or home improvement loan determines he
or she has fallen victim to abusive lending practices, he or she may file damages
against the originator of the loan as well as any subsequent purchaser, servicer, or other assignee. Damages are limited to “amounts required to
extinguish the borrower’s liability under the home loan, plus the total amount
paid by the borrower in connection with the transaction, plus amounts required
to recover costs, including reasonable attorney fees.”
According to MFA, financial institutions that
originate, purchase, service, or otherwise play a role in
manufactured housing lending and/or home improvement loans are unwilling to
participate in these kinds of transactions because they cannot justify the potential
liability associated with them. While it
is true that many state- and federally-chartered institutions benefit from certain
preemptions granted by the Office of Thrift Supervision and Financial
Institutions Division, these institutions state that the preemptions typically
do not extend to loans they purchase, service, or receive as an assignee. Repeal of Section 7 would significantly limit
the assignee liability associated with these types of loans and may restore
markets for these loans.
PERFORMANCE
IMPLICATIONS
One
of MFA’s master servicers, Charter Bank, suspended
purchases of MFA loans secured by manufactured homes as a result of the
existing Section 7. Repeal of Section 7
would likely allow Charter Bank to resume manufactured home loan purchases
under MFA’s first-time homebuyer programs.
Although manufactured home loans do not comprise a significant portion
of MFA’s single family mortgage loan portfolio, they do represent an affordable
housing alternative for many
LMK/yr