Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Cravens |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT
TITLE |
DWI Amendment Reconciliation |
SB |
207 |
||||
|
ANALYST |
Bransford |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
Indeterminate |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB 144 and HB 94
Conflicts with SB 99
LFC Files
Response
Received From
Attorney
General (AG)
Corrections
Department (CD)
Department
of Transportation (DOT)
Public
Defender Department (PDD)
Administrative
Office of the Courts (
Department
of Public Safety (DPS)
Department
of Health (DOH)
Administrative
Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
No
Response
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 207 reenacts the amendments signed
into law during the 2003 session, but repealed by a subsequent bill and
contains an emergency clause. The
legislation increases the penalties for driving under the influence of
intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI) and creates new penalties for subsequent
convictions. It also mandates treatment
for second and third DWI convictions and for incarcerated offenders. Specifically the amendments to Section
66-8-102 NMSA 1978:
Significant Issues
DOT reports that if
New Mexico does not comply with federal law requiring blood/breath alcohol
concentration of .04 for a person driving a commercial vehicle the Department’s
Federal Highway Construction Fund will be withheld at a rate of 5 percent or
$8.4 million the first year and 10 percent or $16.8 million each year after.
The Motor
Transportation Division (MTD) reports that failure to comply with federal commercial
driver requirements may result in a loss of federal funds for enforcement as
well.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Corrections Department reports that
implementing the bill will have an indeterminate fiscal impact on the
department because it will be required to provide substance abuse treatment to
felony DWI offenders. The bill will also result in longer and perhaps more
prison sentences.
The PDD and DAs report that as penalties
increase more cases will go to trial. However,
both agree that it is impossible to predict future caseloads and therefore
neither is requesting additional resources at this time.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
CONFLICT
This legislation and its companion senate bills,
SB 144 and HB 94, conflict with SB 99 in the penalties for second convictions
(five days for a second offense, 10 days for aggravated second offense). SB99 has no provision for fifth, sixth or
seventh convictions. The bills all
require treatment for second and third convictions but SB 99 requires 30 days
inpatient and 60 days outpatient treatment.
SB 99 does not require CD to provide substance abuse counseling or treatment.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The AG reports that passing this bill will
clarify legislative intent at issue in the State v. Anaya where the Supreme
Court ultimately ruled that legislative intent was not clear and therefore a
special kind of felony had been created not subject to habitual offender
enhancement. This bill does not treat
DWI repeat felony offenders the same as all other repeat felony offenders for
purposes of habitual offender enhanced penalties.
VB/njw:yr