Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes.

 

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).  Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR

Leavell

DATE TYPED

1/28/2004

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE

Fees for Interest in Game and Fish Department Land

SB

76

 

 

ANALYST

Aguilar

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY04

FY05

FY04

FY05

 

NFI

 

Indeterminate

Recurring

Game

Protection Fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

 

Responses Received From

Department of Game and Fish (DGF)

Commissioner of Public Lands (SLO)

 

SUMMARY

 

Synopsis of Bill

 

Senate Bill 76 amends Section 17-1-14 NMSA 1978 by providing for fees for interest in Department of Game and Fish lands and also providing for a limit on those fees.

 

Significant Issues

 

The State Game Commission recently approved a rate schedule to reflect current desires and market values.  This schedule sets rates above current appraised market value for the land based on specific use. 

 

Implications to the Department of Game and Fish would be that appraisals would need to be obtained prior to establishing a fee for a particular commercial activity.  Fees are presently set by the State Game Commission rule.

 

The State Land Office (SLO) is also currently updating their rate schedule for commercial activities. An alternative would be to utilize as much of the SLO standard rate schedule as possible without appraisals.  Other than special circumstances, i.e. microwave towers, this would standardize user rates for state land use across both agencies.

 

The Commissioner of Public Lands may authorize a credit of up to 30% of the fair market value of the interest to be granted if, after a written showing by the applicant, the commissioner, in his sole discretion, determines that the grant of an easement or right of way, with a credit, will enhance oil and gas production from trust lands and that the royalties resulting from the enhanced oil and gas production will far exceed any benefits derived from receiving fair market value from the grant of easement or right of way.

 

The State Game Commission owns approximately 170,000 acres dispersed throughout New Mexico.  There are a variety of commercial activities associated with most all of these properties ranging from oil and gas developments, electrical transmission lines, guiding and outfitting to day rides on horseback.

 

DGF reports:

·        Of the 16 rates approved, public concern has been raised on 4 specific items.

·        Any monetary fees collected by the State Game Commission properties are subject to federal aid requirements if they were purchased using federal aid dollars.

·        Fees collected must be recorded as program income and 75% of the fee must be returned to the Federal Aid Program.

·        The Department will only realize 25% of the fee.

·        As written, the bill would require the Department of Game and Fish to maintain a portfolio of current market or appraised value for lands.  The department would be subject to following the states property control division rules and regulations and those of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in obtaining market values.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The cost of establishing and maintaining this portfolio would fall on the DGF who at this time does not have the real estate expertise or personnel to carry out this work.

 

TECHNICAL ISSUES

 

There may be no basis for an appropriate valuation of wildlife or wildlife habitat under current commercial appraisal methods. This could potentially result in substantial under valuation of fees necessary to offset damage to habitats and cause an inequity in relation to other state land use fees.

 

PA/njw:yr