Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe
PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Picraux |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
HJM4 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Develop Crimes Against Children Teams |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Maloy |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See Narrative |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts
Office
of the Attorney General
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Joint Memorial 7 states:
·
the rate of child abuse in
·
serious physical and sexual abuse of
children do not have consistent system resolutions;
·
child abuse victims deserve effective
case management;
·
comprehensive data collection systems
facilitate reporting, investigation, prosecution and disposition of child abuse
cases;
·
national consensus indicates
multidisciplinary approaches to intervention in child abuse cases improve the
outcomes for victims and hold offenders accountable; and
House Joint Memorial 4 – Page 2
·
the
The Memorial resolves:
·
a multidisciplinary team be developed for
each judicial district of the state;
·
each team be comprised of:
a district attorney;
a representative of
each law enforcement agency within the jurisdiction;
a representative of
the CYFD protective services program;
a representative of
the medical community;
a treatment provider;
victim advocate(s);
tribal
representatives;
probation officers;
school
representatives; and
representatives from
other entities with an interest in children’s welfare;
·
each multidisciplinary team meet at least
one per month, adopt a formal protocol to investigate, prosecute and manage
child abuse cases, and develop a
tracking system for child abuse cases;
·
the Task Force (established by the
Attorney General) continue to include representation from all necessary
professional fields and to act as a resource to the local multidisciplinary
teams through developing a model protocol, collecting data and reviewing cases;
·
the Task Force continue to provide annual
legislative recommendations; and
·
the Task Force be permitted to apply for
and receive grants from public and private organizations.
Significant Issues
According to the
Administrative Office of the Courts, several review and oversight mechanisms
exist for child abuse and neglect cases in
• The citizen review board makes recommendations to the children, youth and families department, the courts, and the legislature regarding statutes, policies and procedures relating to substitute care for children in the child abuse and neglect system (NMSA Section 32-8-4).
• Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) are charged with advocating for the best interest of abused and neglected children caught up in the court system, and to ensure that every child has a safe, supportive and permanent home.
• Ongoing since 1995, federal grant money under the auspices of the federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (also known as the Family Preservation and Support Act) has been awarded to the administrative office of the courts, on behalf of the state supreme court, to develop and manage the court improvement project, a comprehensive effort to assess and improve judicial proceedings related to child abuse and neglect, foster care, and adoption.
• The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court appointed a broadly based task force to coordinate the project. This task force - including judges, social workers, attorneys, treatment providers, and child and family advocates - is joined by many other “interested parties” in implementing the project’s initiatives.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no appropriation contained within this
Memorial.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The Memorial will result in administrative costs
(staff time and resources) to the participating agencies. However, the costs should be nominal and
absorbed into existing resources within the participating agencies.
SJM/lg