Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
HBIC |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
469/HBICS |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Film Production Tax Credit Eligibility |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Gilbert |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|||
Indeterminate |
Indeterminate |
Indeterminate |
Recurring |
Severance
Tax Permanent Fund |
Indeterminate |
($1,000.0) |
($1,100.0) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to HB 222
LFC Files
Response
Received From
State
Investment Council (SIC)
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Economic
Development Department (EDD)
New
Mexico Tourism Department (NMTD)
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Attorney
General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The
House Business and Industry Committee Substitute for House Bill 469 allows the
State Investment Council (SIC) to intercept the refundable tax credit for film
production in New Mexico, or file for such credit on behalf of a New Mexico
film project if the SIC has purchased the estimated refundable tax credit from
the film project in order to provide additional funding for use in the
production of a New Mexico film project. HB 469/HBICS expands the film
production tax credit eligibility for certain types of technology expenditures
made in
This bill also allows the SIC to loan to, at a
market rate of interest, an eligible New Mexico film project up to eighty
percent of an expected and estimated film production tax credit available to a
film production company pursuant to the provisions of Section 7-2F-1 NMSA 1978;
provided that the film production company agrees to name the SIC as its agent
for the purpose of filing an application for the film production tax credit to
which the company is entitled, should the company fail to apply for the credit.
The
Additionally, HB 469/HBICS contains an emergency
clause and would become effective immediately.
Significant Issues
This bill amends current statutes to allow the
SIC to offer production companies 80% of their expected tax rebate, upfront. The bill also adds language specifying that
to receive the tax rebate, a production company must
provide access to a print of the film for the purpose of a
The expansion of eligible expenditures to
include new technologies reflects the movement in the film industry towards a
wholly digital process.
HB 469/HBICS gives the state EDD Film Division a
greater and more independent role in certifying that a film company has met the
requirements for the tax credit. One new requirement in the substitute bill is
that a film company must notify, through newspaper notices, that public
creditors have a right to file creditor claims against the company.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD) estimates
that this bill will increase utilization of film credits by (1) expanding the
definition of eligible film productions; (2) expanding the types of
expenditures eligible for credits; and (3) facilitating use of credits by
enabling the state to apply for them on behalf of a taxpayer. Credits claimed and approved in the first
year of the program will be about $4 million.
The 1997 Economic Census for
The Department of Finance and Administration
(DFA) believes that the fiscal impact of this bill is indeterminate. Up to $87 million is available to invest in
local film production at a maximum investment of $7.5 million per film. The fiscal impact is dependant upon the
number of companies that take advantage of the funds provided in statute.
According
to the EDD, the tax rebate expansion to film technologies is at worst a
revenue-neutral proposition. From the
inception of the film tax rebate program,
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
The TRD states that it will incur significant
additional costs under this proposal.
All forms, instructions and publications associated with the film
production credit will have to be updated.
Additional FTE will be required to process credit claims and
applications.
RELATIONSHIP
HB 222 appropriates $75 thousand to the Economic Development Department (EDD) to finance the operations of the film advisory board.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The substitute bill again does not correct the
potential anti-donation clause problem in Section 7-2F-1(G). The TRD and Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
raised this issue in prior years and it has never been corrected. The concern is that if a company has paid
$100 (tax liability) and qualified for $120 in tax credits, it will receive a
refund of $120. This extra $20 is above
its liability and thus constitutes a gift/donation.
Section 2 of the bill states the company shall
name the NM Film Division and State Investment Council as its “agents.” According to the AGO, this term should be
defined, particular to this statute, because the term has many other legal
connotations.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According
to the Department of Tourism, studies have shown that many visitors to
Costs associated with
hosting film premieres are normally paid through
RLG/lg:yr