Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Irwin |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
343/aHGUAC |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Expand Retiree Health Care to Certain Boards |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Geisler |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates:
SB 263
Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HGUAC
Amendments
The
House Government and Urban Affairs Committee amendments to HB 343:
1) Expand the RHCA board’s
authority to construct or acquire a headquarters facility by providing the
option of financing the building from the retiree healthcare fund. Currently the only option available to the
RHCA is to seek revenue bond financing from the
2)
Increase
the authorized dollar limit from $2.5 million to $3.8 million for the purpose
of planning, designing, acquiring, constructing, equipping and furnishing an
administration building, including the acquisition of real property for that
purpose.
According
to the RHCA, the fiscal impact on the solvency of the retiree healthcare fund
is
minimal, as long term savings in rental payments will
offset the initial use of fund balance either to pay for a facility or to pay
the debt service on revenue bonds.
Synopsis of Original
Bill
The bill would allow “former participating
employer governing authority members” who have served a participating employer
for at least four years to participate in the NMRHCA program and requires them
to pay monthly premiums of one-twelfth of the annual cost of claims and administration
allocated to the member by the board, plus the monthly participation fee set by
the board, as was enacted for legislators in the 2003 session.
Significant Issues
According to RHCA, “former participating
employer governing authority members” are typically former members of school
boards, city councils, and county commissions.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Since this new class of eligible retirees would
pay 100% of their costs under the RHCA plans, it is not anticipated that there
would be any fiscal implications for this agency.
GGG/dm:yr