Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
King |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
318 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Corrections Intensive Supervision Fund Uses |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Reynolds-Forte |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
|
|
See Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Corrections
Department
Juvenile
Parole Board
Administrative
Office of the Courts
Attorney
General’s Office
Administrative
Office of the District Attorneys
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 318 changes the name of the Corrections
Department “intensive supervision fund” to the “community supervision fund” and
expands the purpose for which it may be spent.
Currently, the fund may be used for intensive
supervision related costs. House Bill
318 will allow the Department to spend this fund to cover cost related to all
probation and parole programs.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
House Bill 318 will not impact the amount of
money collected to deposit into the fund; the bill expands the use of the fund
only. The Legislature takes credit for
revenues in this fund in the Corrections budget.
Probation and Parole fees are deposited into
the fund. In FY03, approximately $900.0 was collected and deposited and $923.0 was spent on
intensive supervision programs. The
Executive Budget Recommendation notes that approximately half of offenders are
paying the fee and a recommendation is made for the Department to make greater
efforts to collect this fee on a regular basis. Additional fees are anticipated
from this effort.
Currently the fund may only be used for intensive supervision purposes which is
a limited program. If revenues are
collected above those which are budgeted, the
Department may request a budget increase.
Under current law, the Department could only request the increase for intensive
supervision related costs. With the
changed use of the fund, the Department would be able to request increases for
any probation and parole cost. These
revenues would be limited by the General Appropriation Act limitation on
increasing other state fund revenues which is currently a 5% increase
limit.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The Corrections Department believes this bill
could result in a slight decrease in the administrative burden on staff that is
required to administer probation and parole programs by allowing more flexibility
in the use of these funds.
RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 318 relates to the General
Appropriations Act which appropriates the monies from this fund to the
Corrections Department.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Corrections Department believes that the
bill could encourage the probation and parole officers who supervise
probationers and parolees who are under regular supervision to intensify their
efforts to collect the fees knowing it may benefit them, i.e., more equipment,
programming, furniture, etc., rather than just ISP.
The Administrative Office of the District
Attorneys estimate there is no fiscal impact related to this bill, but is concerned
this change could adversely affect the intensive supervision program
which they believe is very important.
They bring up the issues that if the fund is allowed
to be used to fund the rest of the Corrections Department probation and
parole programs, sufficient funds may not be available to continue and expand
the intensive supervision programs.
PRF/lg