Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Saavedra |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
176 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Additional Judgeships |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Koplik |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$1,269.0
|
|
$1,110.8 |
$1,110.8 Recurring $158.2 Non-recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts
Public
Defenders Office
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 176
appropriates $1.269 million from the general fund for five judgeships, in the
Ninth, Eleventh, and Thirteenth judicial district courts, in
Significant Issues
This Corrections Oversight and Justice Committee sponsored
bill creates and provides for an appropriation for: one new judgeship in the
Ninth Judicial District, one new judgeship in the Eleventh Judicial District
(McKinley County), one new judgeship in the Thirteenth Judicial District
(Sandoval County), one new Metropolitan Court judgeship, and one additional
magistrate judgeship in Santa Fe County.
The metropolitan court
judgeship in
The magistrate court
judgeship in
The three district court
judgeships in the Ninth, Eleventh, and Thirteen Judicial Districts shall be
appointed by the governor pursuant to the provisions of Article 6 of the
Constitution of New Mexico.
The bill provides
appropriations for salaries and benefits and furniture, supplies and equipment
for the additional judges and support staff.
The effective date of
the act is
The appropriations are
laid out in the following table:
JUDGESHIP APPROPRIATIONS
Judgeships |
Appropriation to the
Court or the AOC |
9th
Judicial (1 judge and support staff) |
$299.7 |
11th
Judicial (1 judge and support staff) |
$299.7 |
13th
Judicial (1 judge and support staff) |
$299.7 |
Metro Court (1 judge
and support staff) |
$280.6 |
Magistrate - |
$89.3 |
Total |
$1,269.0 |
In November 1998, the
AOC completed and updated an expanded study to provide the legislature with a
methodology for determining the needs for additional judgeships – the Weighted
Caseload Study. The study assigns a
weight, expressed in minutes, for each type of case heard in a court. The weight represents the average amount of
judge’s time necessary to process a case of that type. Each weight is multiplied by the number of new
cases filed per category.
The Chief Judges Council
reviewed all district, metropolitan, and magistrate judgeship requests
statewide and considered both the need as determined by the Weighted Caseload
Study applied to FY 03 data, as well as additional narrative and testimonial
information. The Council voted to
support the judgeship requests in this bill.
The results of the
Weighted Caseload Study for each judgeship request in this bill as follows:
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
This bill provides a $1,269.0 appropriation from
the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered
balance remaining at the end of FY 2005 shall revert to the general fund.
$1.11 million of the $1.269 million
appropriation is a recurring expense of to the general fund. The remaining $158.2 for initial set-up costs
is non-recurring.
SK/yr:lg