Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Vigil |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
168 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Maximum Driving and On-Duty Time Violations |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Reynolds-Forte |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|
|
|
|
Minimal |
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Taxation
and Revenue Department
Public
Safety Department
Public
Defender
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 168 modifies
penalties for violating sections of the Motor Vehicle Code pertaining to
exceeding the current 10 and 15-hour driving rules and adds new offenses with
penalties for exceeding 11 and 15 hour driving rules. The bill also adds new
offenses with penalties for not having a log book and
for not having a record for the previous seven days
House Bill 168 does not
have a specified effective date.
Significant Issues
The Department of Public
Safety points out that in April of 2003, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration issued significant revisions to the HOS (Hours of Service)
regulations. This affects 49 CFR Part
395.3 – Maximum driving time for property-carrying vehicles and 49 CFR Part
395.5 – Maximum driving time for passenger-carrying vehicles. These regulations went into effect on
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
House Bill 168 adds new offenses with penalties
to the Motor Carrier Act. The Taxation
and Revenue Department estimates that these changes will have no significant
fiscal impact.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Taxation and Revenue Department suggests
that it might be appropriate to clarify the phrase: “No record for previous 7
days” on page 6 of the proposal. An alternative wording might be something
similar to: “No logbook containing records documenting activities during the previous
7 days”.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
Taxation and Revenue Department notes that this legislation is in compliance
with new federal rulings issued
PRF/lg:yr