Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Lundstrom |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
149 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Reimburse Counties for Inmate Extraditions |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Reynolds-Forte |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$1,000.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 90 and SB 162
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Corrections
Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 149 appropriates $1 million from the
general fund to the Corrections Department in FY 2005 to reimburse counties for
the expense of extraditing and transporting state inmates. Any unencumbered or unexpended balances
revert at the end of FY05.
Significant Issues
The Corrections Department is concerned that the
bill does not define “state inmates,” and there is no generally recognized or
commonly understood definition of this term.
Most extraditions are of persons charged with, but not convicted of a
crime. Therefore, these persons have usually
not been committed to the custody or supervision of the Corrections
Department. The lack of definition is
somewhat less problematic in the context of “transporting state inmates”
because counties transport many inmates who have been sentenced to Department
prisons.
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
$1 million is appropriated
from the general fund to the Corrections Department in FY05 to reimburse
counties for the cost of extraditing and transporting “state inmates.” It is unknown if this amount is sufficient
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
The Corrections Department is concerned that the
bill would result in a significant increase in the administrative burden to
certain Department personnel who would be responsible for paying for the claims
submitted by the counties.
On the positive side, the bill could indirectly
result in a reduction in the number of inmate transports required of the Corrections
Department (e.g., transporting prison inmate to court) since the counties may
be more willing to undertake the task if they received reimbursement.
PERFORMANCE
IMPLICATIONS
The
bill could slightly impair the Department’s ability to pay contractors in a
timely manner since some business managers and accounts payable personnel will
be required to process a large number of new claims.
RELATIONSHIP
HB149 relates to SB90 which appropriates $2
million to the Corrections Department to reimburse counties for parole violator
expenses(housing and transport) and SB 162 which sets
up the county detention reform fund and appropriates $63.6 million to the fund
to reimburse counties for housing and ancillary service costs.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Corrections Department does not have any
information on most extraditions. Therefore,
it would be somewhat difficult for the Department to verify these claims. The Department suggests that perhaps it would
be more appropriate for the Local Government Division of DFA to administer this
fund. The Local Government Division has
administered this Fund in the past.
RLG/dm:yr