Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for
standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other
purposes.
Current FIRs (in
HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may also be obtained from the LFC
in
SPONSOR |
Nunez |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
122/aHEC |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
NMSU Arid Urban Turf Grass Program |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY04 |
FY05 |
||
|
$244.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
NMSU,
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of HEC Amendment
The House Education Committee amendment adds an
evaluation requirement which reads as follows:
“The institution
receiving the appropriation in this bill shall submit a program evaluation to
the Legislative Finance Committee and the Commission on Higher Education by August
2007 detailing the benefits to
the State of
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 122
appropriates $244 thousand from the general fund to the Board of Regents of
NMSU to establish an arid urban turf grass education, research and extension
program in the Agronomy and Horticulture Department.
Significant Issues
NMSU reports a growing need for turf grass
managers attributable to the new golf courses being built by communities and by
Indian groups that utilize their casino activities to attract tourists. Because no
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $244
thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining
at the end of FY05 shall revert to the general fund.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This request was not
among the priorities submitted by the Board of Regents to the CHE. Consequently, it was not reviewed by the
Commission.
AMENDMENTS
The following language is suggested for all new
recurring higher education programs and expansion of current programs (assuming
that funding will continue beyond FY05):
“The institution
receiving the appropriation in this bill shall submit a program evaluation to
the Legislative Finance Committee and the Commission on Higher Education by August
2007 detailing the benefits to
the State of
LB/yr