Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Beam |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
59 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Increase Tobacco Products Tax |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|
|
|
|
2,300.0 |
2,300.0 |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
43.0 |
43.0 |
Recurring
|
General
Fund (GRT) |
|
29.0 |
29.0 |
Recurring |
Local
Gov. (GRT) |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to
HB 86, Tobacco Stamp Procedure Changes
HB 220, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Appropriation
SB 192, Smart Moves Smoking Cessation Program
Funding
HM 1, Promote Cigarette Taxation Parity
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
Department
of Health (DOH)
Human
Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 59 amends statute to increase the
tobacco products tax from 25 percent of the value of the product to 40
percent. This tax is
imposed on the first link of the supply chain entering
Significant
Issues
The
tobacco products tax—which is imposed as a percent of value at the wholesale
level—has traditionally been imposed at a higher effective tax rate than the cigarette
tax, which is imposed on a per unit basis.
The current cigarette tax rate is roughly 25% of retail value. Depending on the assumptions used in regard
to the amount of retail mark-up, and the base price on which that mark-up
applies, the tobacco products tax rate could be set at between 40% and 47% to
achieve a tax rate equivalent to 25% on retail.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes the following
assumptions in determining the fiscal impact.
(1) The proposed tobacco
products tax increase, although expressed as percentage of the value of sales,
would likely lead to an equivalent percentage price increase.
(2) We assume the elasticity
of demand for tobacco products in
(3) Given the above
assumptions, the proposed tax increases leads to a 15% increase in the average
price of tobacco products, resulting in a 6% decline in taxable sales of tobacco
products in the state.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
ISSUES
The HPC makes the following points:
Since
the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was signed in November 1998, the
cigarette industry has been forced to raise prices to cover the costs
associated with the settlement. The agreement between the attorneys general
from 46 States and the major cigarette companies was intended primarily to
reimburse States for expenses related to the treatment of smoking-related
illnesses. Cigarette companies have boosted prices as a result of payments
required by the settlement. Higher prices have curtailed consumption, although
not as much as originally expected. The long-term decline in cigarette consumption
due to non-economic factors continues as well.
Domestic consumption was expected to slide by more than 2% in 2003. Fourteen states were expected to increase
excise tax in 2003 ranging from $ .17 to $1.50 in
National Smoking Statistics
The Campaign for
Tobacco-Free Kids, utilizing data from the US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention-2001 and 2002 data, note the following statistics for
·
36.2% (41,000) of NM High School students
smoke cigarettes. Kids (under 18) in
·
13.8% (15,630) of NM High School student
use spit tobacco.
·
National youth smoking rates have
declined somewhat since 1997, but remain at historically high levels. According
to the National Youth Tobacco Survey, 28.4% of all
·
In
·
2,100
Tobacco-Free Kids Statistics
(www.tobaccofreekids.org)
·
Average state
cigarette tax as
·
Tobacco state average
as
·
Non-tobacco state
average as
Smoking-Caused Monetary Costs in
Annual health care
costs in
As of
January 2002
Any legislation that motivates New Mexicans to
quit or reduce smoking is in the best interest of New Mexicans health.
SN/yr