Fiscal impact
reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative
Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The
LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they
are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the
NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments,
whereas HTML versions may not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may
also be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR |
Lujan, B |
DATE TYPED |
|
HB |
14 |
||
SHORT
TITLE |
Legislative Employee PERA Contributions |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST |
Garcia |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
|||
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
PERA
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
PERA
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Under current law, if a public-affiliated
employer subsequently reemploys a PERA retiree, the retired member who returns
to work is required to pay his or her associated retired member contributions. In addition, the public-affiliated employer
will be required to remit employer contributions to PERA on the working
retiree’s behalf, as adjusted for the full actuarial cost as determined by
PERA. HB 14 proposes to exempt retired
members who return-to-work for the legislature to perform legislative session
work from the requirement of remitting retired member and employer
contributions.
Significant Issues:
1) The bill addresses whether the legislature
deems it appropriate to exempt certain categories of PERA retirees from the
requirement of remitting associated retired member and employer contributions.
2) PERA retirees
who return to work for the legislative branch of government to perform legislative
session work will be required to remit retired member contributions. In addition, the legislative branch of
government that employs these PERA retirees will be required to pay employer
contributions on their behalf.
3) Exempting legislative employees from paying
contributions sets a precedent for other return-to-work retirees in other
agencies to request exemptions as well.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The fiscal impact on PERA is unknown at this
time. PERA is unaware
of the number of PERA retirees that the legislature employs during a typical
legislative session. Nonetheless, exempting retired
legislative employees from paying into the PERA fund, will have a negative
impact on the PERA fund, where before dollars were being diverted to the fund.
However, this impact is minimal and will not significantly impact the actuarial
valuation of fund because the number of employees is minimal as well as the
dollars.
The
contributions for temporary legislative staff results in a take home pay
reduction of roughly 8 percent. The contributions are roughly $100 thousand
from the state and $50 thousand from the employee.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
HB 14 will have an administrative impact on PERA. PERA will be required to amend its regulations
to address the statutory changes to the PERA Act. In addition, PERA will be required to modify
the development of its new pension administration system to program for the
exemption of PERA retirees who work the legislative session from being required
to pay contributions. This modification
may result in an additional cost to PERA in its development project.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The PERA Board has adopted a position to resist efforts to repeal the current statutory requirements for remitting both employee and employer contributions, and advocates the retention of the statutory requirement of remitting contributions for retired members who return-to-work for affiliated public employers until sufficient actuarial experience is gained to determine the actuarial impact of the current return-to-work provisions of the PERA Act.
The exemption to the PERA Act’s return-to-work provision for PERA retirees who return to work the session for the legislature is a policy decision for the legislature. In making its decision the legislature should be aware that the PERA Board position is that all similarly situated members should be treated alike.
Furthermore, the return-to-work provision may provide an incentive for retirees to retire when they are eligible. For instance, most retirees do not return until a few years after they retire, which is accounted for in the actuarial valuation. Consequently, more employees retiring when they are eligible creates a liability to the PERA fund. The impact of this incentive to retire when eligible and return-to-work is immeasurable at this time.
HB
14 contains an emergency clause that will make the exemption available for PERA
retirees that are currently employed by the legislature for the current 2004
legislative session.
DG/yr:lg