NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Marquardt

 

DATE TYPED:

10/31/03

 

HB

13

 

SHORT TITLE:

Compensating Tax Deduction for Defense Systems

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Williams

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY04

FY05

 

 

 

 

Potential for Significant Revenue Loss *

 

Recurring

General Fund

 

Potential for Revenue Loss *

 

Recurring

Local Governments

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

* See discussion below.

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

No Responses Received From Agencies

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 13 authorizes a deduction from compensating tax for equipment, replacement parts, components and systems brought into the state for testing and evaluation programs of the United States Department of Defense at a major range and testing facilities.  The deduction is effective beginning July 1, 2004.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The bill would result in a recurring General Fund and local government revenue loss.  The magnitude of the revenue loss is under review, but could be significant.  At a special session hearing, industry representatives indicated potential total tax liability for one firm of $10 million.  The potential annual impacts are expected to be erratic based on variations in project activity levels from one year to the next.

 

 

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

Language in the bill is broadly applicable, and could be narrowed to focus on specific economic development goals and to ensure the incentive is effective.

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

  1. How would the incremental benefits and costs of this tax incentive be measured?

 

AW/yr