NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
SFC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Increase Judgeships in Certain Judicial
Districts |
SB |
906/SFCS |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to SB 39, SB 143 and SB 176
LFC files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 906 amends
Section 34-6-6 NMSA 1978 to increase the number of judgeships in the Third
Judicial District Court from six to seven.
Senate Bill 906 also amends
Section 34-6-9 NMSA 1978 to increase the number of judgeships in the Sixth
Judicial District Court from two to three. The judge of division 1 shall reside and
maintain his principal office in Grant county.
A temporary provision
is included in the bill which states that the two judgeships created by this legislation
shall be filled by appointment by the governor pursuant to the provisions of
Article 6 of the constitution of
Significant
Issues
RELATIONSHIP
HB 52 requests a salary
increase for all state judges in
SB 39 requests an
additional judgeship for the Third Judicial District Court.
SB 143, the “judgeship
bill,” addresses the needs for judgeship in district, metropolitan and magistrate
courts.
SB 176 requests an
additional judgeship for the Sixth Judicial District Court.
CMH/yr