NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Sanchez, M. |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Telecommunications Performance Assurance Fund |
SB |
775 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Padilla |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
Indeterminate--see
narrative |
|
|
Recurring |
New
Fund – Performance Assurance Plan Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
Indeterminate--
see narrative |
|
Recurring |
New
Fund – Performance Assurance Plan Fund |
|
(Indeterminate) |
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Public
Regulation Commission
Attorney
General’s Office
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 775 adds a new section to the New
Mexico Telecommunications Act to create a special, non-reverting fund in the
state treasury called the “Performance Assurance Plan Fund.” The fund would be administered by the PRC and
financed by payments from telecommunications companies that are subject to a
“performance assurance plan.” The fund
would be used by the PRC to administer and audit the performance assurance plan
of the telecommunications company.
Significant
Issues
1. The
This bill concerns what are called “Tier 2” payments. Tier 2 payments will be made directly to states when Qwest’s performance with respect to overall measurements is deficient.
2. This bill would allow the PRC to use the Tier
2 payments specifically for administration of the QPAP. The PRC reports the fund would allow for the
following activities:
·
Wholesale performance oversight
·
Participation in region-wide oversight
and wholesale dispute resolution
·
State-specific dispute resolution
proceedings
·
Audits required by the QPAP
3. The PRC believes that without this new fund,
it may not be able to pay for its share of the costs of monitoring the QPAP.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill would appropriate any money in the
Performance Assurance Plan Fund to the PRC.
If this bill is not enacted, Qwest’s Tier 2 payments will go into the
general fund. The PRC could not estimate
what Qwest’s payments might be. The
payments will be affected by the volume of wholesale activity from CLECs and
Qwest’s ability to meet its performance targets. Although the payments will likely be
recurring, they will fluctuate from month to month.
The PRC estimates that
The AGO believes the costs of the PRC’s efforts
to monitor the QPAP should be borne by the cost-causer, in this case
Qwest. This bill would create the means
to allow the cost-causer to bear the costs.
Continuing Appropriations
This bill creates a new fund and provides for
continuing appropriations. The LFC
objects to including continuing appropriation language in the statutory
provisions for newly created funds.
Earmarking reduces the ability of the legislature to establish spending
priorities.
LP/njw