NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Boitano |
DATE TYPED: |
3/6/03 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Incompatibility as Grounds for Divorce |
SB |
677 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Chavez |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
NFI |
NFI |
|
See Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB 755
Children
Youth & Family Department (CYFD)
Administrative
Office Of The Courts (AOC)
LFC
Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 677 amends
Section 40-4-1 NMSA 1978 to provide certain conditions for the use of
incompatibility as grounds for dissolution of marriage. Senate Bill 677 additionally mandates counseling
prior to the dissolution of certain marriages.
Significant
Issues
Domestic Abuse is defined in
the Family Violence Protection Act means any incident by a household member
against another household member resulting in:
Household member
as defined in the Family Violence Protection Act means a spouse, former spouse,
family member, including a relative, parent, present or former stepparent,
present or former in-law, child or co-parent of a child, or a person with whom
the petitioner has had a continuing personal relationship. Cohabitation is not necessary to be deemed a
household member.
An order of protection is defined in the
Family Violence Protection Act as a court order granted for the protection of
victims of domestic abuse.
The bill requires that prior to entering a
dissolution of marriage decree in which a minor child is in the custody of one
or both parties, the parties are required to attend counseling. There are specifications for the counseling
requirement stated in the bill. The
cost for the mandated counseling will be paid by the parties and may be
allocated between the parties by the court.
There may be cases where counseling is not
possible because of income limitations.
The AOC indicates that the cost of counseling may result in an imbalance
regarding who is able to get divorced.
AOC further indicates that there could be an equal protection argument
because of the statute’s application.
If the poor couples cannot be granted a divorce because they cannot
afford the counseling requirement, the AOC indicates this may create an
unconstitutional classification.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill contains no
appropriation. However, the AOC
indicates that the bill requires that under certain circumstances the court is
being asked to find that an order of protection has been entered and also the
court is being asked to monitor the counseling that couples may be required to
attend. The AOC indicates that these
requirements will be possible only with additional administrative and judicial
time and resources. Additionally, there
will be minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution, and
documentation of statutory changes.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The court will need to
perform additional duties as required by the bill.
DUPLICATION
Senate Bill 677 duplicates House Bill 755.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Having custody of a
minor child can mean legal custody, which is the right to make major
decisions affecting the child’s life (e.g., regarding religion, medical care,
education) or physical custody, which is the actual possession and
control of the child, or both. “Joint
custody” can mean either joint legal custody (parents share the
decision-making, but the child remains with one parent) or “joint physical
custody” (child divides time between each parent’s home) or both.
2. Should the purpose
of the mandated counseling be included or set out in the bill?
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
FC/ls