NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Maes |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Chiropractic Physician Licensing |
SB |
657 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Geisler |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates:
HB 738
Regulation
and Licensing Department (RLD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
The
purpose of the Senate Bill 657 is to amend the Chiropractic Physician Practice
Act to clarify licensing requirements, expand privileges and increase
penalties.
3. Increase Penalties: The increase of penalties is related to practicing chiropractic without a license. The increase entails changing the penalty for this violation from a misdemeanor to a fourth degree felony and increasing fines. It is essential that these changes become effective to allow the board jurisdiction over unlicensed activity.
Compliance and consistency with the Uniform Licensing Act is being clarified within these statutes to provide the board with the authority to take action on a licensee for the defined causes. It is imperative that the appropriate language is specific in dealing with disciplinary cases.
Significant
Issues
The changes in the scope of practice and definitions
are significant. They will provide assurance
that the scope of practice is clear and easy to interpret for prospective
licensees, the public and legal counsel. These changes will eliminate exploitation
of the chiropractic profession by clarifying and defining the privileges in the
statute; provide consistency with credentialing and procedures related to medicare and medicaid; establish
minimum understanding of the chiropractic physician responsibilities; clarify
the extent of privileges: and define
boundary lines between many alternative medicine health care boards.
The existing endorsement requirement is not
clear which creates a struggle for interpretation of the requirements—the
changes proposed by this bill clarify the requirements.
All other changes will “update” unclear and
outdated language to be consistent with the activities of the profession, the
current law and other similar professions regulated by state government under
the New Mexico Statute Authority.
The law is necessary in the board’s mission to
protect the public, to provide quality service to constituents and to permit
greater efficiency in the operation of the board.
The Board of
Pharmacy (BOP) believes this bill gives Chiropractors the authority to order/prescribe
prescription drugs including Controlled Substances. In order to prescribe controlled substances, chiropractors needs to
register with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and be added to the
definitions for “Practitioners” in both the NM Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act
(authority for prescribing dangerous/prescription drugs) and the NM Controlled
Substances Act (for ordering/prescribing Controlled Substances).
By clarifying that the
bill does not allow prescription of controlled substances, chiropractors would
not be required to license with the Board of Pharmacy or the DEA. See suggested amendment below.
AMENDMENTS
Page 3, line 10, after “includes” insert the
words “prescribing or”
Page 3, line 17, after “certifiction” insert the words “except any such use or
treatment shall not include controlled substances.”
GG/ls