NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Romero |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Educational Retirement Contributions |
SB |
609 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Gilbert |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1
See Narrative |
Recurring |
ERB |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
State Department of Education (SDE)
Educational Retirement Board (ERB)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 609 adds a new section to the
Educational Retirement Act, which exempts retired Public Employees Retirement
Association (PERA) employees from making employee contributions to the
Educational Retirement Association (ERA) fund, should they accept employment
with a local administrative unit. Such
employees are not eligible to purchase or acquire service credit for the time
worked with local administrative units. Local administrative units, however,
must make required employer contributions for these employees.
Currently, persons employed more than .25 FTE by an ERA local administrative unit make contributions to the ERA fund. This includes PERA retirees who have not suspended PERA retirement. When such persons leave employment with a local administrative unit, ERA refunds their contributions, plus interest.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
ERB believes that this
bill would not have an actuarial effect on their fund. However, under current
law, ERA invests employee contributions and returns such contributions and
interest upon employee termination. Under this bill, the ERA fund would be
impacted if investment returns typically exceeded the interest rate paid on
refunds.
To guarantee that SB
609 is consistent with NM Const. Art. XX, Section 22, (no benefits may be
enhanced unless the costs of such benefits are properly funded in accordance
with actuarial standards), an actuarial study should be performed to verify
that this bill is cost-neutral.
RLG/ls/njw