NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Leavell |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Governor’s Deer Enhancement Permits |
SB |
560/aSFl #1 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Valenzuela |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$0.1 See
Narrative |
|
|
Recurring |
Game
Protection Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 See
Narrative |
$0.1 |
Recurring |
Game
Protection Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SUMMARY
The
Senate Floor #1 amendment to Senate Bill 560 changes the name of the permits
from the Governor’s Deer Enhancement Permit to the Lieutenant Governor’s Deer
Enhancement Permit.
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 560 would
authorize the State Game Commission to sale two deer licenses, one through
auction (highest bidder) and the other through lottery (raffle), and use the
revenue to complete deer restoration or management projects. The bill provides that the auction or lottery
be conducted by DGF or by an incorporated nonprofit organization dedicated to
conservation of wildlife. The revenue would be deposited into the Game
Protection Fund.
Significant
Issues
The big game enhancement fund exists in statute
for elk and bighorn sheep, in similar manner as that proposed in this bill. The
auction and raffles have been very successful in generating additional revenue
for these enhancement projects.
The bighorn sheep permits serve as an example. For the past three years, these licenses have
been highly sought after, as measured by the prices paid in auction and
lottery. For 2000, the auction permit brought in $85,000 while the lottery was
sold for $40,000. For 2001, the auction
permit brought in $75,000 while the lottery was sold for $45,000. For 2002, the auction permit brought in
$157,500 while the lottery was sold for $75,000.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 560
appropriates revenue generated from the auction and lottery to DGF. DGF approximates
the annual at $35.0. This estimate is based on the following assumptions:
1.
Amounts that elk and bighorn sheep
enhancement permits have brought in recent years
2.
Comparative abundance of trophy class
deer vs. elk and bighorn sheep in the state
3.
Availability of deer permits in NM and
other states
4.
Anticipated desire of hunters for special
Governor’s deer permits.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The administrative
impact is minimal on the department. DGF, in the past, has contracted out the
function of auction and lottery sale to an incorporated nonprofit, who is paid
through a 10 percent commission on the sales.
MFV/prr