NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Carraro |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Increase Cigarette Tax |
SB |
528 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
$29,277.0 |
$31,938.0 |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
Neutral |
|
Recurring |
County
and Municipality Recreation Fund |
|
Neutral |
|
Recurring |
County
and Municipal Cig. Fund |
|
$5,086.0 |
$5,548.0 |
Recurring |
|
|
$3,813.0 |
$4,160.0 |
Recurring |
NMFA |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to:
HB143
Cigarette Delivery Sales Act
SB336 Change Cigarette Tax and Revenue Distribution
HB488
Increase Cigarette Tax
LFC files
Responses
Received From:
Department
of Health (DOH)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 528 (SB 528) proposes to increase the rate of
the cigarette excise tax from the current state tax of 21 cents-per-pack to 81
cents-per-pack. SB 528 also proposes to
modify distributions of cigarette tax revenue in a manner that reduces the
distribution percent, yet maintains the current level of revenue for the county
and municipality recreational fund and cigarette tax fund. Further, both the percent and the amount
going to the Cancer Research and
The table below details the distribution changes included in SB 528:
Subsection |
Entity
affected by redistribution of cigarette tax revenue |
Current percentage
distribution |
SB 528 proposed
distribution |
A |
County and
Municipality Recreational Fund |
.0475 |
.0147 |
B |
County and
Municipal Cigarette Tax Fund |
.0950 |
.0295 |
*C |
UNM Cancer and |
.0475 |
.1066 |
*D |
|
.07125 |
.0901 |
*C - This
increase provides that 21.5% of this distribution shall be used for genomic research.
*D – This
increase provides that 75.7% of the distribution be used for the expansion of
the
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Data
sources: Taxation and Revenue Department monthly reports of taxable stamp sales
by the Taxation and Revenue Department; economic research reports on the
elasticity of demand for cigarettes; taxable consumption data from various
other states.
TRD
notes the following assumptions:
(1)
Proposed tax increases were converted to
the equivalent percentage increase in price, assuming the average price of a
pack of cigarettes in
(2)
We assume the elasticity of demand for
cigarettes in
(3)
Given the above assumptions, the proposed
tax increases lead to a 24% increase in the average price of taxable
cigarettes, resulting in a 17% decline in taxable sales of cigarettes in the
state. Taxable sales have been declining
for the last several years in response to sharp price increases. Without a tax increase, taxable sales should
drop to 91.7 million packs in FY 2004.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
National
Smoking Statistics
·
According to Tobacco Facts, one
out of 5 people who dies in the
·
Smoking is the number 1 preventable cause
of premature death in the
·
Smokers, on the average, live 7 years
less than those who do not smoke.
·
According to the Surgeon General, smoking
causes heart disease, lung and esophageal cancer, chronic lung disease, and
contributes to cancers of the bladder, pancreas and kidney.
·
Men who smoke are 22 times more likely to
die from lung cancer and 10 times more likely to die from bronchitis and
emphysema.
·
Second-hand smoke exposes non-smokers to
carcinogenic elements in cigarette smoke.
·
Over 90% of adults who smoke began
smoking in adolescence.
The
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, utilizing data from the US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention-2001 and 2002 data, note the following statistics for
·
36.2% (41,000) of NM High School students
smoke cigarettes. Kids (under 18) in
·
National youth smoking rates have
declined somewhat since 1997, but remain at historically high levels. According
to the National Youth Tobacco Survey, 28.4% of all
·
In
·
2,100
Smoking-Caused Monetary Costs in
Annual
health care costs in
US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-2001 and 2002 data).
As of January 2002
Any legislation that
motivates New Mexicans to quit or reduce smoking is in the best interest of New
Mexicans health.
The redistribution of
cigarette tax revenue as described in SB528 will likely negatively impact those
entities who stand to lose revenue to fund the
programs they administer.
UNMH is considering a building project in the
future. This will involve the university
issuing low interest bonds to pay for the project with revenues from the
hospital used to service the debt.
Revenue from the cigarette tax, in conjunction with revenue from low
interest bonds, will be used in the building and operating of the structure.
What is Genome Research?
·
Genome
research is the study of the genome, which is the collection of genes passed
down from cell to cell, generation to generation in a given organism; the
complete collection of DNA. The Human
Genome Project is an international research effort to determine the location of
all human genes and to read the entire set of genetic instructions encoded in
human DNA. Once scientists complete the ultimate task of sequencing all 3 billion
base pairs in the human genome, they will have created a virtual blueprint for
a human being. Genomics research seeks to understand the structure and function
of the human genome and its role in health and disease. (National Human
Genome Research Institute website)
·
UNM has become a leader in
A substantial
increase in the cigarette tax will increase the pressure to enforce this
tax. Significant tax-evasion
opportunities present themselves. At
present, the Department does not have the personnel to ensure full
compliance. Effective administration of
this tax may be impossible without statutory changes that permit the state to
collect the tax when cigarettes first enter the state. Such a system, employed in
SN/yr