NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Lopez |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Workforce Training Act |
SB |
418/aSEC/aSFC |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Collard/Williams |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB 160
Relates to HB 392, HB 394, HJM 103, SB 368, SB
370, SB 221 and SB 14
Relates to funding in SB 655
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Labor Department
Commission
on Higher Education
Economic
Development Department
New
Mexico State Department of Education
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee amendment removes
the appropriation. Funding is included
in Senate Bill 655.
Synopsis
of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee amendment adjusts
the formula calculation from projected number of students to projected student
credit hours and adds language to require a credit-hour equivalent of courses
normally considered under the tier-2 undergraduate funding level. This amendment addresses some of the CHE
concerns outlined below.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
Senate Bill 418 appropriates $3 hundred thousand
from the general fund to the Commission on Higher Education for the purpose of
implementing the Workforce Investment Act.
Significant Issues
Senate
Bill 418 creates a Workforce Training Program to provide customized, non-credit
training opportunities at
CHE
notes the formula contained in Senate Bill 418 raises the following
issues:
·
formula
treatment of courses bearing credit versus courses without credit;
·
the
number of students in training compared to the number of hours of training;
·
instructional
costs of the workforce training programs
·
approval
of workforce training courses
Credit
courses versus courses without credit –
The
Blue Ribbon Task Force Base Plus formula model uses the per course credit hours
to determine funding per student per course.
For example, a 3 hour lab course which awards 1 hour of student credit
generates 1 unit of formula funding per student. A 3 hour theory course which awards 3 hours
of student credit generates 3 units of formula funding per student. Senate Bill 418 does not stipulate the
treatment of non credit course contact hours.
Number
of students in training compared to the number of hours of training required –
The
formula in Senate Bill 418 instructs the commission to distribute workforce
training funds based upon the number of students enrolled in a customized
training program. Distribution of funds
based upon the number of students without consideration of the number of contact
hours required for completion of a training program will result in the
inequitable funding of non-credit courses.
Per
Instructional
costs of the workforce training programs –
The
Blue Ribbon Task Force Base Plus formula model does change the methodology by
which public higher education in New Mexico is funded; and even though the
instructional cost model has not been updated in quite a few years, the Blue
Ribbon model continues to be based upon the instructional costs borne by
institutions in offering academic courses.
In Senate Bill 418, the commission is directed to use Tier II of the
undergraduate funding level in calculating the non-credit course value. A cost study of the non-credit courses has
not been conducted. It can not be
determined whether or not the Tier II funding level would be adequate to meet
the needs of the institutions. Per
Approval
of workforce training courses –
Senate
Bill 418 does not provide a mechanism by which non-credit courses are approved
prior to funding. Per the “Feasibility
of Funding Non-Credit Instruction at Community Colleges for Work-force
Development” report prepared by David McKinney, “all states that fund
non-credit instruction appear to have policies and procedures in place that
limit non-credit instructional support only for workforce training type
programs. They require prior approval of
courses funded or have approved a syllabus of courses.”
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
The
appropriation of $300.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the
general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of
FY04 shall revert to the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
The
CHE notes beginning in the second year
of implementation funding is to be distributed based upon the number of
students enrolled in customized training in the prior year at all of the
community colleges participating in the workforce training program. CHE maintains a state-level, statewide Data
Editing and Reporting System (DEAR).
Institutions submit student data to the commission via DEAR.
Currently, neither non-credit courses nor students
in non-credit courses are reported to the commission. In order to run the formula in Senate Bill
418, the commission would be required to modify DEAR so that non-credit course
data could be submitted to the commission.
Additionally, the institutions would be required to modify their
processes so that they may collect and submit the data to the commission.
Neither administrative funding nor additional FTE
for these modifications are included in this bill.
The
New Mexico Labor Department (NMDOL) indicates enactment of this bill will
require an increase in staffing of the One-Stop-Operators to investigate
whether a participant is receiving state funding that duplicates the federal
Workforce Investment Act funding already being provided to the participant.
DUPLICATION
and RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill duplicates
House Bill 160. Senate Bill 418 relates
to House Bill 392, House Bill 394, Senate Bill 368, Senate Bill 370, Senate
Bill 221, and Senate Bill 14 as they all implement portions of the Blue Ribbon
Task Force Base Plus Incentives funding model.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
NMDOL notes the legislation contains no
standards for determining eligibility for participation in the program and no
provision for the issuance of regulations to clarify eligibility issues.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
CHE notes that while
in-plant training is geared toward employers and Workforce Investment Act
programs are aimed at unemployed or under employed individuals, the Workforce
Training Act is directed at training for persons already employed.
CHE also notes in the 2002 interim, the Commission on
Higher Education named a Blue Ribbon Task Force to determine the desire and
necessity for recommending a significant change in
·
Supports
both increased access and economic development for
·
Makes
the funding model easier to understand, and
·
Rewards
successful institutions, successful students, and success in serving
In
the Task Force discussions, non-credit workforce training was not
forgotten. As the community colleges
have not been required to submit non-credit course information to the commission
via DEAR, many community colleges have not implemented internal systems for
collecting non-credit data. Thus, the
decision was made to not seek a formal formula addition for non-credit courses
at this point in time. However, the
commission is committed to seeking formula change for non-credit courses upon
the collection and submission of needed non-credit course data.
As
an alternative, the Blue Ribbon Task Force recommended the creation of the Work
Force Skills Development Fund. The
commission has recommended $1 million be appropriated to this matching fund for
broad-based entry-level high-skills training programs which will result in economic
development for the State of
NMDOL notes that Senate Bill 418 includes the
same training concepts as are federally mandated by the Workforce Investment
Act, and is concerned about duplication of services. There are a number of
duplicative or similar workforce training programs throughout many departments
in the state. It would benefit the state
to consolidate these programs under one umbrella, namely the Office of
Workforce Programs in the Governor’s office, to streamline and not duplicate
workforce development services across the state. The following departments have some sort of
workforce development or training program:
· Commission
for the Blind;
· Commission
on Higher Education;
· Commission
on the Status of Women;
· Corrections
Department;
· State
Department of Public Education;
· Labor
Department;
· Economic
Development Department;
· Energy,
Minerals and Natural Resources Department;
· Governor’s
Office;
· Human
Services Department;
· State
Agency on Aging;
· State
Highway and Transportation Department; and
· Veterans’
Service Commission. KBC/njw