NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
SCONC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Comprehensive Zoning Plans |
SB |
410/SCONCS/aSFl#1 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Padilla |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Attorney
General’s Office
Department
of Finance and Administration
Regulation
and Licensing Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SFl Amendment
The Senate Floor Amendment #1 removes
language from the SCONC substitute bill that would have required a county that
adopts subdivision regulations that are more strict
than the requirements in the Subdivision Act to identify the least
stringent regulations possible to meet the goals of the comprehensive
plan. The bill now simply requires a
county to specifically identify any regulations that are more stringent, but
they no longer have to be the least stringent possible.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
The Senate Conservation Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 410 amends the New Mexico Subdivision Act to require a county that adopts subdivision regulations that are more strict than the requirements in the Subdivision Act to do the following: 1) Ensure that the county’s comprehensive plan identifies and explains the need for requirements that are more strict, and 2) identify the least stringent regulations possible to meet the goals of the comprehensive plan.
The bill also makes minor technical corrections to current statute.
Significant
Issues
The substitute bill is substantially different than the original. The issues identified in the original bill are no longer present. DFA’s Local Government Division believes the committee substitute raises no significant issues.
LP/njw/ls