NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Nava |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Blood Donations |
SB |
351 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to:
HB 152
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
NM
State Department of Education (NMSDE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill
351 allows minors who are at least seventeen years old to donate blood without
parental consent. A minor would not
receive monetary payment for the blood donation.
Significant
Issues
In general,
parental consent is required in
Lack of the
currently required parental consent might become an issue only in instances of
adverse reactions where the minor and the parent might have limited legal
recourse.
Health
conditions of teenage females, who often are anemic, are of concern. The incentive to donating too many times for
money has been removed, thus removing a health concern.
RELATIONSHIP
SB 351 nearly duplicates HB 152, which would allow minors
who are at least seventeen years old to donate blood, and would not allow these
same minors to receive payment. The
difference between the two bills is that HB 152 includes a description of
entities from whom a minor may not receive payment, SB
351 does not contain those descriptors.
Other provisions of the NMSA authorize unemancipated minors to consent to medically related
procedures:
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
SB
351 would allow youth to participate in blood donation activities one year
earlier than is currently possible, by law.
At age eighteen, young adults reach the age of consent and donating
blood would not require parental consent.
However, there is concern for teenage females who are often anemic and
not good candidates for blood donation.
Testing for this condition would be important at the donation site, and
referral for treatment of the condition would be important.
Allowing
seventeen-year-olds to participate in blood donations provides an opportunity
for them to do something positive for others, gives
them a sense of self-esteem and contributes to the greater good of the
community.
By
lowering the age, seniors in high school, who generally range from ages 17-19,
could participate in a blood drive specifically situated at the school,
increasing much needed blood donations, and they would not need parental consent
in order to participate.
BD/yr