NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Cravens |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Reserve Law Enforcement Officer Authority |
SB |
310 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Department
of Public Safety
Taxation
and Revenue Department
Office
of the Attorney General
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 310
proposes to allow
“reserve officers” that have been certified by the
Significant Issues
1. Currently, only salaried
officers can issue citations under the Motor Vehicle Code.
2. The bill does not define
“reserve officer”.
3. What is the distinction
between being “certified” by the Academy vs. being “commissioned”?
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
There
exist no direct fiscal implications relating to SB 310. However, the Department of Public Safety will
benefit administratively by having their workforce / manpower
supplemented. This will allow the full
officers to direct their attention to more serious crimes within their communities.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
Department of Public Safety offers the following comments:
In
reality, there are very few reserve officers that are certified by the law
enforcement academy. Because agencies
are not required to report non-certified reserves to the law enforcement academy,
it is difficult to accurately determine a percentage, but it is most likely
less than 5% of the total population of reserve officers.
The
few reserve officers that are certified were salaried at one time. Consequently, they have been through the same
basic academy training as their salaried counterparts, and are required to keep
up with the same continuing education requirements. They are in recognized reserve programs where
the agency lists them as employees, where they are subject to defined rules
and regulations, and are required to perform a certain amount of reserve
service every year.
The
State Law Enforcement Academy Board does not convey a distinct reserve
certification. There is only one
certification issued – peace officer.
And, by statute and rule, the person must be an employee.
Departments
who would utilize this bill must be willing to properly train and equip the
officers at a level of equal footing to their full-time counterparts. This would enable them to conduct their
duties safely and reduce the possibility of tort liability on the supervising
department.
SJM/njw