NOTE: As provided in
LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance
committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee
does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this
report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF
formats) is available on the Legislative Website. The Adobe PDF version includes all
attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.
Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Feldman |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Voter Action Act |
SB |
222 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Chavez |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
$300.0 See Narrative |
|
Recurring |
New Public Election Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB 420
Public Regulation Commission (PRC)
Secretary of State (SOS)
Attorney General’s Office (AG)
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate
Bill 222 proposes campaign financing of elections for commissioners of the
Public Regulation Commission through a “public election fund” with money
provided by:
Senate Bill 222 would enact a new
unnumbered section of the Election Code, cited as the “Voter Action Act”.
Section
2 provides definitions for terms used in
the Voter Action Act, (“the Act”).
Section
3 requires a candidate choosing to
obtain public financing under the Act to first file with the Secretary of State
and to have not received or spent more than $500 in contributions.
Section
4 requires applicant candidates to obtain
qualifying contributions from the number of registered voters equal to at least
one-quarter percent of the total vote cast in the last general election for all
candidates for governor in the district in which the candidate is running. No payment, gift or anything of value shall
be given in exchange for a qualifying contribution.
Section
5 allows an applicant candidate to
collect seed money from individual donors and political action committees in
amounts of no more than $100 per donor or committee, up to a maximum total of
$5,000. The applicant can use his own
funds, also up to this total, but cannot accept donations from a corporation,
association, partnership or labor organization.
Section
6 requires the Secretary of State to
determine whether an applicant candidate’s final submittal of qualifying
contribution meets the requirements of the Act and to certify the candidate
within 10 days if the requirements of the Section are met.
Section 7
requires that all money distributed to a certified candidate be used for the
candidate’s campaign-related purposes, with the surplus returned to the public
election fund. The candidate shall limit
the total campaign expenses and debts to the amount received from the fund. A certified candidate shall not accept
contributions or loans from any other source except his political party.
Section
8 limits a political party’s
contributions (in-kind and monetary) to no more than ten percent of the
candidate’s public financing. Nothing in
this section shall prevent political party funds from being used for general
operating expenses of the party.
Section
9 requires
the Secretary of State to publish guidelines outlining permissible
campaign-related expenditures. Applicant
candidates shall file a report listing seed money contributions and
expenditures with their application for certification. Ten days before a primary or general
election, all non-certified candidates with a certified opponent must report to
the Secretary the amount spent by that non-certified candidate. A person or political committee that spends
money to influence a race involving a certified candidate must report to the
Secretary the amount spent.
Section
10 would create in the state treasury the
public election fund for the purposes of financing the election campaigns of
certified candidates for covered offices.
The fund would receive $300,000 per year segregated from the proceeds
collected as follows: $100,000 from inspection
and supervision fees, $100,000 from utility and carrier inspection fees and
$100,000 from insurance premium taxes.
In addition money appropriated by the legislature would be included in
the fund. The fund would also collect
qualifying contributions submitted to the secretary of state, unspent money
from candidates and unspent seed money.
Section
11 requires the Secretary by
Section
12 requires the Secretary to distribute
money from the fund to certified candidates beginning with the general election
cycle that ends with the general election in 2006.
Section
13 requires the Secretary to determine by
Section
14 requires the Secretary to distribute
additional funds to a certified candidate with a non-certified candidate
opponent who raises or spends an amount greater than that distributed to the
certified candidate. The additional
amount can be up to the original amount provided to the certified candidate.
Section
15 requires the Secretary to adopt rules
to ensure effective administration of the Voter Action Act.
Section
16 provides a procedure for challenging a
certification decision by the Secretary.
An appeal can be taken to the district court. A party found by the court or Secretary to
have made a frivolous appeal has to pay all costs involved.
Section
17 provides for a civil penalty of up to
$10.0 for a violation of the Voter Action Act.
In addition to a fine, a certified candidate found in violation of the
Act may be required to return to the fund all amounts distributed to the
candidate from the fund.
Section
18 would amend Section 59A-6-2 NMSA 1978 to
increase by three-thousandths of a percent the premium tax paid by insurers
authorized to transact insurance in
Section
19 would add the Voter Action Act to the
list of moneys in Section 59A-6-5 NMSA 1978 to be paid daily by the insurance
superintendent to the state treasurer.
Sections
20 and 21 provides a higher ceiling for the
utility and carrier inspection fees (Section 63-7-20) and would make
small increases for inspection and supervision fees (Section 62-8-8 NMSA
1978).
Section
22 is a severability clause providing that
if any part of or application of the Voter Action Act is held invalid, the
remainder of its provisions or its application to other situations or persons
shall not be affected.
Section
23 makes the effective date of this bill
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill
proposes to create a Public Election Fund with $300.0 from three different
fees: inspection and supervision fees,
utility and carrier inspection fees and insurance premium tax fees. These revenues
currently go to the
general fund.
The bill also
proposes fee increases to offset any general fund impact. The attached table shows the estimated
incremental revenue could vary within the specific fee categories. For example, the utility and carrier
inspection fees could have incremental revenue of $183.0 which is greater than
the $100.0 designated in the bill from these fees. The estimated incremental revenue for inspection
and supervision fees and the premium tax fees will be $49.0 and $11.0,
respectively, less than the amount estimated from these fees.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The
Secretary of State (SOS) indicates that a high-level auditor must be hired as
an FTE, otherwise performance of the agency will be compromised. However, this will not come out of the
general fund. Section 10, subparagraph A states that the public election
fund will be used to pay for administrative and enforcement costs of the
Voter Action Act.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
**The title of the bill includes “making an
appropriation”, but no appropriation is made in the bill.
***It
should be noted that the method for the distribution of funds should not be allocated
as a dollar amount but the amount should be allocated in terms of the
percentage increase for each of the fees.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. Should the election
for commissioners of the Public Regulation Commission be publicly funded?
Attachment