NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Feldman |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Alternatives Fuel Tax Exemption |
SB |
193 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Reynolds-Forte |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
($458.0)* |
($500.0)* |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
($104.0)* |
($113.00* |
Recurring |
State
Road Fund |
|
($52.0)* |
($57.0)* |
Recurring
|
Local
Governments |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
*The Energy
Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy reports that there
are approximately 5,600 exclusively alternative fueled vehicles in use in
Motor vehicle
excise tax collections are credited 100% to the general fund. Vehicle registration fees are distributed
approximately 2/3 to the state road fund and 1/3 to local government road and
general funds.
Conflicts with HB70
Responses
Received From
Taxation
and Revenue Department
State
Highway and Transportation Department
Environment
Department
Energy,
Minerals and Natural Resources Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
SB193 bill exempts
vehicles that operate exclusively on alternative fuel and gas-electric hybrid
vehicles from annual motor vehicle registration fees, and exempts the purchase
of those vehicles from the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax. “Alternative Fuel” is defined for purposes of
the tax and fee exemption as “natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas,
electricity, hydrogen, a fuel mixture containing not less than eighty-five percent
ethanol or methanol, a fuel mixture containing not less than twenty percent
vegetable oil or a water-based hydrocarbon fuel emulsion consisting of a hydrocarbon
base and water in an amount not less than twenty percent by volume of the total
water-phased fuel emulsion.” SB193
has a
Significant
Issues
The Energy, Minerals
and Natural Resources Department states in their analysis that passage of SB193
would:
1.
Increase the sale of alternative fuel vehicles that
operate exclusively on alternative fuel and gas-electric hybrid vehicles,
resulting in reduced emissions and dependence on foreign oil and improved fuel
efficiency.
2.
Provide an incentive to private individuals
(non-government entities) by exempting alternative fuel vehicles and
gas-electric hybrids from the excise tax of 3% of the sale price of the
vehicle. The average price of an alternative fuel vehicle is $20,000, resulting
in a $600 savings for the consumer.
3.
Provide an additional incentive to private
individuals to purchase alternative fuel and gas-electric hybrid vehicles
because of the exemption from vehicle registration fees.
The Environment Department notes that alternatively fueled motor
vehicles produce less air pollution than traditionally fueled motor
vehicles. Exempting such vehicles from
paying motor vehicle excise taxes and from paying registration fees could
encourage the purchase of more of these vehicles in
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
SB193 exempts vehicles
that operate exclusively on alternative fuel and gas-electric hybrid vehicles
from motor vehicle registration fees and motor vehicle excise tax. This will decrease revenues to the general
fund, the state road fund and to local governments as noted in the table
above. Local government funds that will
be negatively impacted include county and municipal road funds and general
funds.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The Taxation and
Revenue Department does not think the administrative impact will be significant
although the motor vehicle personnel may require some documentation certifying
that a vehicle does, in fact, qualify for the exemption.
CONFLICT
SB193 conflicts with HB70, which exempts alternative
fuel vehicles from the motor vehicle excise tax. HB70 defines alternative fuel differently,
does not exempt the vehicles from the motor vehicle registration fees and does
not exempt gas-electric hybrid vehicles.
TECHNICAL
ISSUES
The definition of “alternative fuel” contained
in this proposal is not consistent with the definition contained in the
Alternative Fuel Tax Act (Section 7-16B NMSA 1978), which provides preferential
fuel excise tax rates for alternative fuel buyers.
·
For the purpose of this proposal,
alternative fuel means “natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, electricity,
hydrogen, a fuel mixture containing not less than eighty-five percent ethanol
or methanol, a fuel mixture containing not less than twenty percent vegetable
oil or a water-based hydrocarbon fuel emulsion consisting of a hydrocarbon base
and water in an amount not less than twenty percent by volume of the total
water phased fuel..”
·
Pursuant to the Alternative Fuel Tax Act,
alternative fuel means “liquefied petroleum gas, compressed natural gas,
liquefied natural gas, or a water-phased hydrocarbon fuel emulsion consisting
of a hydrocarbon base and water in an amount not less than twenty percent by
volume of the total water- phased fuel emulsion…”
This discrepancy may
cause some confusion for taxpayers, motor vehicle division personnel, and fuel
tax administrators
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
For the Highway and Transportation Department,
the inevitable growth in the use of alternative fuel vehicles presents a
significant challenge to funding highway transportation infrastructure
needs. The current road fund tax
structure, with its reliance on traditional fuel taxes, must be restructured in
order to receive highway user fees from the new generation of alternative fuel
vehicles, particularly gas-electric hybrids and fuel cell technology. Providing incentives for alternative vehicle
technology while still maintaining highway infrastructure needs will
increasingly pose a very difficult issue for state policymakers.
The Taxation and Revenue Department notes that a federal
income tax deduction of $2,000 is available for purchase of a gas-electric hybrid
vehicle in 2003, although the deduction phases-down by $500 per year over the
following three years. The State of
PRF/prr